Boy, that shit sure ain't worth defending. I cannot believe the number of struggle sessions where people told me just to give it a shot and I didn't get the context or whatever. Jesus Christ.

  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 years ago

    Hearing Nick talk makes me cringe because I know the exact kind of guy he is. He and I kind of ran in similar circles at the same time here in Baltimore though I don't recall ever meeting him. Tons of chauvinism with a veneer of progressivism and an inability to take anything seriously except your own image. It's what happens when a millennial chud grows up in a diverse environment.

    • gayhobbes [he/him]
      hexagon
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 years ago

      These are the guys I don't trust if the revolution comes, basically. It's what puts me off about brocialists and it makes me to my core fear we'll never have a viable left, because wreckers like this embed themselves so deeply and then all their useful idiot friends defend them to death.

        • gayhobbes [he/him]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 years ago

          I don't want to hear Amber talk about wreckers ever again when she's friends with loathsome fucks who no right-minded person would trust, as if that shit isn't divisive as fuck

          • constantly_dabbing [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            4 years ago

            I don’t want to hear Amber talk about wreckers ever again when she’s friends with loathsome fucks who no right-minded person would trust

            Chapo Chat, like /r/cth, is an enemy of dirtbag leftists. "Amber can't talk about bourgeoisie infiltration of workers movements because she's friends with some douchebag" KEEP LOSING

      • constantly_dabbing [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        wreckers like this embed themselves so deeply

        wreckers are the people who tried to cancel Amber for attempting to organize for M4A

        • gayhobbes [he/him]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Are you having fun commenting on everything I posted?

      • SowTheWind [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        4 years ago

        It's fine if the humor's not for you, that type of offensive humor is always going to be niche. But doubting Nick or Stav's leftism is dumb as shit

        • gayhobbes [he/him]
          hexagon
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yeah Nick's a leftist he's just always saying shitty jokes that undermine any trust that you could engender with a marginalized person, NOTHING wrong with that! Why we'll have America organized by next week!

          • SowTheWind [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            4 years ago

            If you're looking to get offended, you will find it because that's the humor. The humor is insanely offensive shit. What you're missing is Mullen's actual political views, which he rarely talks about on the podcast so I don't blame you. When he talks politics, he's straight up uncompromising leftist. He's a surprisingly smart dude, when he's talking with right-wingers he sees right through their bullshit and casually dismantles their culture war fake outrage talking points to their face

            • gayhobbes [he/him]
              hexagon
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              4 years ago

              I'm not looking to get offended, so where's your argument?

              I know Nick Mullen. I know his politics. He's a doofus stupidpol socdem dipshit and a wrecker. There's not much more to say about it than that. His podcast on top of all of that is intensely unfunny and attracts chuds like 13-year-old loli porn.

              • SowTheWind [none/use name]
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                4 years ago

                "They should absolutely be protesting, they should be rioting, they should go fucking kill that cop ... You should be looting Target". From a clip I just found looking for him talking sincerely about politics

                That's socdem? Or you're clueless and already made up your mind and refuse to be reasoned with

                  • SowTheWind [none/use name]
                    arrow-down
                    24
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    Yeah I'm not getting dragged into that bullshit.

                    I proved him wrong and educated him. He won't call Mullen a socdem again without being a willful liar.

                • gayhobbes [he/him]
                  hexagon
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  That’s socdem? Or you’re clueless and already made up your mind and refuse to be reasoned with

                  Or as I said before I know the dude and he'll talk a big game but he's a dipshit coward who doesn't believe anything he says and is just on the left until he gets his healthcare. Just because he'll say something that sounds good doesn't mean he even believes it.

                  • SowTheWind [none/use name]
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    Yes he's right, but he didn't mean it? Lol, absolutely pathetic. You cant admit you're wrong, so you have to make shit up.

        • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 years ago

          What you're doing here is literally the "it's just a joke bro" thing that right-wing shitstains do to try to excuse their bigotry.

          And that shit isn't even offensive, it's just low effort shock "humor" that requires no creativity or effort at all.

          • Nakoichi [they/them]
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 years ago

            Even if it is "just jokes" it desensitizes people to shit like that and it's basically pushing people in the opposite direction we want. Humor that punches down is always bad even in the RARE instance it's funny.

            • gayhobbes [he/him]
              hexagon
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              Also isn't it telling as fuck that a bunch of chuds glommed onto their shit

              • constantly_dabbing [none/use name]
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                4 years ago

                Also isn’t it telling as fuck that a bunch of chuds glommed onto their shit

                /r/chapotrahouse is full of middle class 1st world socialists, i.e fascists

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 years ago

        I didn't know who he was, just a lot of douche bags exactly like him. A common fixture of substance abusing millennial hipsters in Baltimore about 10 years ago.

    • constantly_dabbing [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      what happens when a millennial chud grows up in a diverse environment

      *petite bourgeoisie, please use class analysis instead of fascist generational theory

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        There is a tendency for people to act as if class is in a vacuum divorced from other factors that is very undialectical. They're are material differences between people who grow up in different eras of capital conditions. The fact that boomers grew up in probably the most lopsided economic environment in history is going to change the way they think. I would say this is no less materialist than speaking on the differences between white Americans and black Americans; sure neither is a class monolith but they do have general shared characteristics.

        The material differences between generations absolutely informs their ideological rifts and it isn't fucking fascist to acknowledge that. Just because you acknowledge that people who grew up in a near uninterrupted period of transfer of wealth from the global south to the US are different than people who grew up in a period of stagnation and redistribution of wealth upwards doesn't mean that you believe the premise if the Strauss-Howe horseshit generational theory lmao.