I’m clearly no economist so maybe I’m missing something obvious, but I cannot wrap my head around why so many believe that the market is just some sort of fundamental, unchangeable property of the universe that is and always will be. Why do we assume that the dollar will always be valuable?

I could be incorrect, but it seems like there is no guarantee that there will be a rebound after a crash (see: 2008). It more so just seems like parts of capital crumble and become inaccessible to people who once had access, thus causing complete inaccessibility for all who come after.

So, boom and bust seems like the greatest misnomer of all time.

  • Elon_Musk [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Every time it dips or crashes it's much more likely that it will rebound than never come back. There's an entire nation working non stop to ensure the highest profits and best returns. Theyll make you a slave before they let the market crash permanently. If you think the dollar is going to tank then invest in tangible assets like gold or ammo.

    Edit: and while you sit on the sidelines waiting for a crash its going to double and triple while your ammo pile just sits there waiting

      • enkifish [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean it is a tangible asset (aka you can touch it).

        • StolenStalin [comrade/them,they/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          The tangible part isnt heat bothers me it sthe 'asset' bit. Gold is only useful ina. Civilization that values shiny shit. If things collapse, shiny shit will not keep its value. Ammo will tho.

          • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Gold's used regularly for electroplating stuff, and is used to solder the ends of wires. It's a good conductor and there's a fair chance that whatever device you used to compose this message has gold circuitry in it.

            • Haterade
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • StolenStalin [comrade/them,they/them]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not even, aluminum is useful as a structural material for vehicle and building applications. Gold is only ever functionally needed as a thin sheet.

              • chocopain [none/use name]
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fun fact: when Napoleon had important guests to dinner, he didn't use his gold silverware. He used aluminum silverware. Because it was more expensive than gold.

          • enkifish [any]
            ·
            1 year ago

            No argument there. Although I could imagine partial collapse scenarios where gold retains some relevance, ammo will always be better. Funny thing is though, gold is only becoming more important due to increased central bank purchases. This is mostly being driven by central banks trying to diversify away from the dollar.

      • Elon_Musk [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because its touchable but hard to get large quantities. Aluminum is just a dumb metal but I could fill my backyard with it in short order.

      • chocopain [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is totally nonreactive and is the most tensile and ductile of all metals. It has value outside of its looks.

        But it's shiny, and people like shiny. People's feelings are quite real.

    • Hohsia [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      This why they call it hell world 😎