Eugenics? What eugenics? There is no mention of eugenics in this research paper. 
Just the eco-fascist narrative that climate change isn't caused by capitalism, but by too many people consuming resources faster than they can be replenished. I'm sure that's not a dangerous idea useful to anyone or anything. 
It's obvious no serious discussion can be had here. 
This community is an antrum of eco-fascists. They're going late.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Did you just link a license to use your comment?
Yes, I know how presumptuous this look, but why not? It is to avoid use the comment to train AI.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
I don't think the AI companies care about copyright. But it would be fun if enough people began using something like this and the AI began just randomly spouting out CC licenses.
I do it because of that, but I suppose that other people that do that really believe in law or something like that.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
I figured it was something like that
Good luck with that.
Real “I DONT AUTHORIZE FACEBOOK TO USE MY IMAGES.” Energy.
It really does, and fundamentally isn't how copyright works either. If it was protected by the license as copywritable (which I really doubt), no license means to permission to use in any way (outside of exclusions, which to be fair to LLM folks these models might be included). Attaching a license only makes it further permissive, not less. If they can train on my comments they can train on theirs, and if they can't train on my comments there are now more ways for someone to train on their comment.
But :shrug-outta-hecks: if they want to cc all their comments whatever.
I'm not too well versed in US copyright law, but there's a considerable degree of harmonisation across borders with intellectual property and I'm fairly confident that it's perfectly legal for anyone to use short quotations for any purpose with or without a license.
pee pee poo poo
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Brought to you by Carl's Jr.
If those spicy autocompletes could read they’d be very upset.