I wouldn't really say that is bad. If it is not some critical part of your system, there is nothing wrong with trying something new. All projects have to start from something.
Personally, I really enjoy it. Apart from the "I switched to this distro because it has nicer buttons" or whatever. I love tinkering and trying out obscure software and learning something from it. Plus, it can often be better. This is exactly how I switched from sudo to doas.
Mainly, it is much easier to config. Sudo has loads of options that you probably won't ever use, especially on your desktop if you have just a single user.
The biggest gap that I've struggled with in Linux is a basic image editing program. I either have very high-performance image editors such as GIMP or Krita, or I have doodoo like KolourPaint
I'm not saying that highly powerful photo editors a la GIMP or Photoshop shouldn't exist, but sometimes you want to just throw some text on top of a meme or something, and you don't want to have to fiddle with layers, brush stroke, style, opacity, etc. and these powerful editors require a lot more configuration for simple tasks that simple editors just don't.
Gimp is the worst of both worlds. 1990s image processing tech under the hood (hope you like your 16-bit channels silently crushed down to 8-bits!), with a complex and crusty old interface on top.
Krita is the real deal though. Still a complex interface but it's very modern under the hood.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I wouldn't really say that is bad. If it is not some critical part of your system, there is nothing wrong with trying something new. All projects have to start from something.
deleted by creator
Personally, I really enjoy it. Apart from the "I switched to this distro because it has nicer buttons" or whatever. I love tinkering and trying out obscure software and learning something from it. Plus, it can often be better. This is exactly how I switched from sudo to doas.
deleted by creator
Mainly, it is much easier to config. Sudo has loads of options that you probably won't ever use, especially on your desktop if you have just a single user.
The biggest gap that I've struggled with in Linux is a basic image editing program. I either have very high-performance image editors such as GIMP or Krita, or I have doodoo like KolourPaint
deleted by creator
But that's the thing, I don't need an alternate to photoshop, I need an alternate to MS Paint that is just a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiittle bit better.
I still can't believe someone hasn't come up with a Paint.net for Linux.
100%, also the paint.net devs act like pricks on their forums toward people that suggest that it would be cool if they went multi platform
Paint 3D :troll:
i dont understand. there is nothing ms paint can do that photoshop can't, so there's no reason to want both.
I'm not saying that highly powerful photo editors a la GIMP or Photoshop shouldn't exist, but sometimes you want to just throw some text on top of a meme or something, and you don't want to have to fiddle with layers, brush stroke, style, opacity, etc. and these powerful editors require a lot more configuration for simple tasks that simple editors just don't.
TheBroodian basically wants a Linux version of Paint.net.
deleted by creator
At this point I can’t live without snagit
Have you tried Pinta
Yes, and it's mostly what I'm looking for, but it's hella buggy and crashes if you breathe on it wrong
Gimp is the worst of both worlds. 1990s image processing tech under the hood (hope you like your 16-bit channels silently crushed down to 8-bits!), with a complex and crusty old interface on top.
Krita is the real deal though. Still a complex interface but it's very modern under the hood.