• Barabas [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is what I'm wondering as well. He thinks Romanovs are a distinct racial group I guess.

      An argument could be made given how inbred royals were/are.

    • ImOnADiet
      ·
      1 year ago

      Were kulaks even much of a problem for the ussr when Lenin was alive? Thought they only truly became a thorn in their side when they began collectivization

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        For hundreds of years the landlord class of Ukraine maintained their power through antisemitic violence. They were always going to be a target of the revolution. It just wasn't until the 30s that an opposition had the means to decisively challenge them.

        • ImOnADiet
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but what I’m saying is that Lenin isn’t even the one who went to town on them, Stalin was lol (or at least that’s my understanding)

      • Hoxhilarious [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lenin picks up a lot of the blame for violence that occurred during the Revolution. While Stalin was the one who made the oppression of the bourgeoisie state policy, Lenin was in charge when the revolution enabled peasants to enact a lot of vigilante violence against their oppressors.

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      it doesn't have to be a genetic trait to be a subject of genocide it could be cultural or religious etc. The term refers to exterminating or destroying a group