The bill bans any “medical interventions aimed at changing the sex of a person,” as well as changing one’s gender in official documents and public records.
The bill bans any “medical interventions aimed at changing the sex of a person,” as well as changing one’s gender in official documents and public records.
That’s an incredibly impoverished definition of anti-imperialism imo, and does injustice to true anti-imperialist struggles. I get what your arguing for but maybe we can define it differently because it’s very different from traditional anti-imperialist struggles
Well... I don't disagree. I mean, I also wouldn't call Russia anti-imperialist the way that say, Cuba obviously is. But that's why I bolded "effectively." Because in terms of what has been accomplished wrt anti-imperialism at least in recent decades, you'd be hard-pressed to find anything that approaches what Russia has done. I don't hesitate to say that Russia gets my critical support when it comes to the war/SMO and I think that is the correct position for any anti-imperialist (regardless of definition) to take. It is good for the global south. It is good for multipolarity. It is good for any future anti-imperialist struggle. And by that same token, it is obviously bad for western imperialism, US hegemony, and the monopolar "rules based order." It's also good for China.
Let me just quote our comrade @AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net from an old thread on this very topic:
It's anti-imperialist in the same way the Kuomintang was anti-imperialist.