Just finished I'm A Virgo - which was awesome - and couldn't help but think of Spike Lee's seemingly incoherent ideology and how, while Boots continues to release bangers, Spike shills crypto.
Admittedly, I have only seen two of Spike Lee's "social" movies, Do The Right Thing (which I really didn't "get" - please chime in if you can clarify) and Bamboozled (which I thought was poignant but a bit heavy handed and nihilistic). It appears to me that Spike Lee grasps the racial inequities in American society, but doesn't grasp the greater dimensions - he's trapped in, or has fallen into the trap of, detached liberalism.
I could be way off base here, so I hope y'all can offer some illumination - it seems like the crucial difference between Spike and Lee is that Boots has read theory.
Thoughts?
When Spike Lee did his interview trail for Chiraq, he actually believed that a sex strike could create substantial change on a large scale.
On one hand
king
On the other hand
That matches up with my perception of his work: he has no underlying theory. He grasps outlines of inequity, but appears unable to tie it together: he presents powerful scenes, but subsequently undermines the impact of those scenes with incoherent resolutions.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator