Foreignpolicy.com is left-wing alternative media? I don't read it (or any liberal rag ) but I've thought of it as being in the NYT cluster, which I occasionally hate read articles from to find out what the liberals are up to these days.
there's a bit of a Financial Times/WSJ thing going on here, where Foreign Policy tries to actually reflect some notion of reality for a decision-making audience. here's a couple articles that you wouldn't expect to see in bourgeois media:
The Littlest Boy about USA stationing backpack nuclear weapons in Europe after WWII as part of a stay-behind Gladio type shit: https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/30/the-littlest-boy/ oh whoops haha that just loads an emtpy masthead now, CURIOUS. but here's the archive of it: https://archive.li/8tvhv
The Bomb Didn’t Beat Japan. Stalin Did. Have 70 years of nuclear policy been based on a lie? https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didnt-beat-japan-stalin-did/
Foreign Policy occasionally will publish geopolitical 'realists' that align with the Kissinger model, most of whom come from the Neo-con method of geo-political analysis, which is heavily influenced by Trotskyist thinking, which itself is heavily influenced by Marxist-Leninism. In essence, occasionally we come to agreement on the way things are/were but we disagree if they were bad/good and how the American empire should proceed with that shared understanding of those historical ideas.
Foreignpolicy.com is left-wing alternative media? I don't read it (or any liberal rag
) but I've thought of it as being in the NYT cluster, which I occasionally hate read articles from to find out what the liberals are up to these days.
there's a bit of a Financial Times/WSJ thing going on here, where Foreign Policy tries to actually reflect some notion of reality for a decision-making audience. here's a couple articles that you wouldn't expect to see in bourgeois media:
The Littlest Boy about USA stationing backpack nuclear weapons in Europe after WWII as part of a stay-behind Gladio type shit: https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/30/the-littlest-boy/ oh whoops haha that just loads an emtpy masthead now, CURIOUS. but here's the archive of it: https://archive.li/8tvhv
The Bomb Didn’t Beat Japan. Stalin Did. Have 70 years of nuclear policy been based on a lie? https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didnt-beat-japan-stalin-did/
deleted by creator
Foreign Policy occasionally will publish geopolitical 'realists' that align with the Kissinger model, most of whom come from the Neo-con method of geo-political analysis, which is heavily influenced by Trotskyist thinking, which itself is heavily influenced by Marxist-Leninism. In essence, occasionally we come to agreement on the way things are/were but we disagree if they were bad/good and how the American empire should proceed with that shared understanding of those historical ideas.
FP is North-Atlanticist, generally