Well of course, that's because state-sponsored media in Western nations has no vested interests!
I'm also thinking of all the neoconservative or openly fascist propaganda shared by privately owned outlets like Washington Post or Time Magazine that would get a pass, because - according to their logic - it's news sponsored by spooky second/third world governments that deserves the criticism for being biased and misleading...
I suspect they don't consider linking to the BBC to be indicative of a bias towards state-sponsored media either
Well of course, that's because state-sponsored media in Western nations has no vested interests!
I'm also thinking of all the neoconservative or openly fascist propaganda shared by privately owned outlets like Washington Post or Time Magazine that would get a pass, because - according to their logic - it's news sponsored by spooky second/third world governments that deserves the criticism for being biased and misleading...