Image is of coup supporters in Niamey, waving the flag of Niger and Russia.
While the coup in Niger is an obvious reason for this megathread's subject, the inspiration to focus here rather than somewhere else in the world this week came from @solaranus@hexbear.net's comment here.
Anyway, as a quick introduction to Niger - the country won independence from the French in 1960 and has since been in an alternating cycle of military governments and more democratic arrangements. In 2010, a junta took over the country from the military junta already ruling it, and then successfully transitioned the country to democracy within a year. President Issoufou was elected and then re-elected in 2016. President Bazoum was democratically elected in 2021, and has just been overthrown last week. General Tchiani looks to be the new head of state.
Like many countries that were previously colonies, outright colonialism by its imperial country has been replaced by neocolonialism by that same country. France issues their currency, thus allowing France to do what the US does with its dollar around the world but in miniature. The country is incredibly poor, surviving on subsidence agriculture, with much of its exports being minerals like gold and uranium, which many children under the age of 14 are employed in extracting. Also like other previously French colonies, the new guys in charge appear to be flipping them the bird, with Burkina Faso and Mali relatively recently asking them to fuck off. It is unlikely to be a coincidence that this is happening as internal dissent inside France itself continues to boil. Given the Russian flags being waved and Putin's promises to supply free grain to some African countries (and though Niger isn't mentioned, Burkina Faso and Mali notably are), one imagines that Russia also might have a hand in things.
Burkina Faso's president, Traore, has been talking with Mali and Guinea, and now Niger - all ruled by military governments - and asking if they're interested in federation, with Mali showing some interest. Traore follows in the tradition of Thomas Sankara, and has appointed a Prime Minister who is similarly aligned. Traore has recently met with a Chinese representative and has firmly aligned himself with Russia, saying that Burkina Faso has "one and the same outlook" on building a new world order, saying:
"Russia made great sacrifices to liberate Europe and the world from Nazism during World War II. We have the same history,"
"We are the forgotten peoples of the world. And we are here now to talk about the future of our countries, about how things will be tomorrow in the world that we are seeking to build, and in which there will be no interference in our internal affairs,"
"However, a slave who does not fight [for his freedom] is not worthy of any indulgence. The heads of African states should not behave like puppets in the hands of the imperialists. We must ensure that our countries are self-sufficient, including as regards food supplies, and can meet all of the needs of our peoples. Glory and respect to our peoples; victory to our peoples! Homeland or death!"
Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.
This week's first update is here in the comments.
No update on Wednesday because I am still busy.
Friday's update is here in the comments.
Links and Stuff
The bulletins site is down.
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Add to the above list if you can.
Resources For Understanding The War
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Telegram Channels
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Last week's discussion post.
Many of the lemmy folk have nothing to contribute since they are afraid of dialogue with Hexbear for whatever reason. They're seemingly afraid of the news thread culture since people here are legitimately interested in geopolitics and think that dead civilians in Donetsk sucks as much as dead civilians in Kyiv.
deleted by creator
True. Hexbear has a special culture that purges bigots. The news thread benefits from that umbrella but also has it's own unique culture.
The kind of analysis here in this thread is uncomfortable to people who want easy answers to anchor themselves firmly in a position that ignores the dark, counter intuitive reality of geopolitics. If you believe in clear cut moral good and evil, wrong and right, pure and problematic, geopolitics is almost impossible to stare into without being nauseatingly disgusted - so it's easier to call us tankies.
This news thread is more active than most communities, and if it was it's own community, we'd be defederated from most others.
this, 100%. I think a key part of the process of paying rapt attention to geopolitics is basically lowering your expectations of everybody involved slowly. Like you start off hating everybody for not being good enough people, and then you slowly go "Well, sure, this guy (Putin, etc) is a transphobic nationalist scumbag but he's doing X Y Z good things so relative to this OTHER guy (Biden, etc) he's kind of alright" and then you begin to not bother with the constant qualifications.
and it's at that point where people who haven't been gazing into the eldritch vortex that is geopolitics begin to go "hey, wait, you're saying Putin is a good guy?!"
so like, it's important to remember that we're all talking on a set of quite heavily lowered expectations. at least in terms of national politics, I think Putin is awful and I would hate to live under him as a communist and I think he should be overthrown in a socialist revolution. I think MBS is a piece of shit oil capitalist who hates women and minorities, and so on through various world leaders. it's just that these people are a) basically all we have in terms of the actors creating a (they hope capitalist, we will hopefully overthrow this and make it socialist) multipolar world order, and b) considerably better than the absolute fucking bloodsoaked ghouls inhabiting the highest offices of western countries. and sometimes, to keep you sane, you do get some genuinely good people on "our side" like AMLO, Diaz-Canel, Maduro, Traore, etc.
I feel like following geopolitics is like understanding the weather. There's pretty much fuck all you can do about it and you won't be able to predict it every time. But being able to read it and predict it to some degree, some of the time, at least gives you chance of either making the most of the sunshine or laying some sandbags before the flood hits.
Plus these ghouls have an enormous impact on our lives either way. I at least want them to know I see through some of their bullshit.
well said
Cheers.
deleted by creator
You’re just describing realism vs liberalism.
It does sort of feel like we go "interesting what the ghouls are doing, how can this be subverted?" while other people go "critical support to /our/ ghouls for imposing faux human rights on others to cause tension"
The year is 2023 and leftists are finding excuses to NOT side against the LITERAL NAZIS.
Your overall point is correct(i.e yes leftists need to understand critical support). But I also think, unfortunately for us, western political discourse has degraded in such a way that even 10 years ago any random real person in the US(i.e so not 4chan kids) would say "yeah fuck the Nazis we won WW2 against them right?".
And then this war happens and suddenly "but they're on OUR side this time???!!!" stops being a joke and becomes reality.
Yes yes paper clip, NATO we know all of that, but bear with me the point here I think is that while we can analyze and say "yeah of course the Nazis never lost they were integrated into western structures" etc I still think it is pretty obvious and clear that the current situation(open support for explicit Nazism) was not in the mainstream, certainly not something anyone would expect libs let alone actual leftists to believe unironically.
Libs that cheered when watching Saving Private Ryan turn around 20 years later and are like "but but they're just a small part of the government now!!!11!!" Not something you'd predict with heavy odds back then.
Don't get me wrong, it's joyous to see explicit nazi's getting pulped on the daily, but watching Russia casually barbeque bunches of nazi's is simply pleasure, not business in current world affairs since those explicit nazi's are just the fruiting body of a deeper mold in our societies. The nazi's won't stop coming until the weight of the planet shifts to suffocate them.
Captain, Mariupol was 15 months ago! (remember the "evacuations", lol)
Haven't you seen those forced recruitment videos, most UA folks getting bbq'd by Russia now are poor mobilized workers from like Odessa and other RU-leaning areas. The Lwov Nazis closest to the front are probably kicking back in the blocking detachments.
Russian telegrams upload pictures of killed Azov and other Nazi militants daily. They are still getting killed regularly and often
deleted by creator
I do think that the weather channel has a pro-weather bias to it.
This is a good bit if we ever make c/weather.
well said.
Found another bugman on here.
What does that even mean?
Maybe, just maybe if there were daily pictures and videos of Kiev getting shelled daily for 8 years up to today even they could begin to make that argument but... yeah no lol lmao even.
I think the rationale here realy just means these people are also very likely to brush aside anti-zionism and the Palestinian struggle as well because its literaly the same argument.