• AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you want to back off what you said and did, I'm fine with that. But don't pretend that you weren't deliberately erasing context and constructing worthy versus unworthy victims.

    And you're pretty touchy for somebody who decided to frame my position as saying innocent people deserve to die when I'm talking about consequences resulting from a bad actor nation state. Perhaps it is you who needs a grip gotten.

    • Dolores [love/loves]
      ·
      1 year ago

      i am not going to walk back emphasizing the human cost in response to a callous dismissal of the reality of a war crime because "they did it first". that is not an exonerating "context".

      the war crimes happened, both sides have done them, you do not get to dismiss your team's by gesturing to what the other guys are doing. they don't aim your bombs.

      you remember this is just a response to the question "what part of the Russian invasion was a war crime?" is what i have cited not a war crime? do you have compelling evidence that Russia has not bombed civilian infrastructure or medical facilities?

      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        i am not going to walk back emphasizing the human cost in response to a callous dismissal of the reality of a war crime because "they did it first". that is not an exonerating "context".

        You need to kill the redditor that lives in your brain because this kind of outright lying to my face about what I just motherfucking said isn't going to keep me engaged in this conversation.

        I'm getting legitimately pissed off at your bullshit now so I'm going to dip out. Have a good one.