He is literally, undeniably, fundamentally insane. No one should take him at his word. He can't even speak Chinese, for fucks sake. You want me to come in here and tell you all about what it's like in Italy, despite never having been there in my fucking life, and knowing so little of their language I couldn't even pull off an Italian accent?
Fucking hell how do you god damn anarchists have your lips surgically attached to the ass of whoever is currently being amplified by the state?
Addressing the origin of the source is basic debate culture, dumbfuck. You don't get to pull quotes from a literal cultist and expect to be taken seriously
I agree, my entire point not just in my comments to you but through the entire fucking post is that you anarchists are incapable of arguing beyond "ok red fash" or other assorted name calling. Not once do you ever provide a single point as to why Zenz should be taken seriously, or another source that does not base its work on his word
I did address if Zenz should be taken seriously, literally my ~~first ~~ second comment starts with "i know he's bad." You're not arguing with me here, we're agreeing in this. I was trying to shed light on how other radlibs or whatever you want to call them are going into these debates.
He is but everyone was aware of that for the first time. People still wanted to know what's going on in Xinjiang though.
So maybe find a non-zenz source and you don't get spammed with zenz bad? lmao
Or maybe address what is in the source?
He is literally, undeniably, fundamentally insane. No one should take him at his word. He can't even speak Chinese, for fucks sake. You want me to come in here and tell you all about what it's like in Italy, despite never having been there in my fucking life, and knowing so little of their language I couldn't even pull off an Italian accent?
Fucking hell how do you god damn anarchists have your lips surgically attached to the ass of whoever is currently being amplified by the state?
This has nothing to do with anarchism or anything lol. this is basic debate culture.
Addressing the origin of the source is basic debate culture, dumbfuck. You don't get to pull quotes from a literal cultist and expect to be taken seriously
Ok, have fun convincing anyone then, lol
I agree, my entire point not just in my comments to you but through the entire fucking post is that you anarchists are incapable of arguing beyond "ok red fash" or other assorted name calling. Not once do you ever provide a single point as to why Zenz should be taken seriously, or another source that does not base its work on his word
I did address if Zenz should be taken seriously, literally my ~~first ~~ second comment starts with "i know he's bad." You're not arguing with me here, we're agreeing in this. I was trying to shed light on how other radlibs or whatever you want to call them are going into these debates.