Addressing the origin of the source is basic debate culture, dumbfuck. You don't get to pull quotes from a literal cultist and expect to be taken seriously
I agree, my entire point not just in my comments to you but through the entire fucking post is that you anarchists are incapable of arguing beyond "ok red fash" or other assorted name calling. Not once do you ever provide a single point as to why Zenz should be taken seriously, or another source that does not base its work on his word
I did address if Zenz should be taken seriously, literally my ~~first ~~ second comment starts with "i know he's bad." You're not arguing with me here, we're agreeing in this. I was trying to shed light on how other radlibs or whatever you want to call them are going into these debates.
Addressing the origin of the source is basic debate culture, dumbfuck. You don't get to pull quotes from a literal cultist and expect to be taken seriously
Ok, have fun convincing anyone then, lol
I agree, my entire point not just in my comments to you but through the entire fucking post is that you anarchists are incapable of arguing beyond "ok red fash" or other assorted name calling. Not once do you ever provide a single point as to why Zenz should be taken seriously, or another source that does not base its work on his word
I did address if Zenz should be taken seriously, literally my ~~first ~~ second comment starts with "i know he's bad." You're not arguing with me here, we're agreeing in this. I was trying to shed light on how other radlibs or whatever you want to call them are going into these debates.