He's technically right that it would be hard to legislate consistently and there would be weird grey zones in doing so but when it comes to deepfakes of actual flesh and blood children which is what is being described here, this falls squarely into the not-at-all-grey area lmao. Its just pointless to bring that up. Laws being hard to enforce correctly isnt a reason to not have them inherently. Because there are things that should very obviously be off limits no matter what and deepfakes of actual flesh and blood children should obviously fall in that category.

Like I don't even know that this dude is an acutal pedophile lmao my read here is that he's a weird as fuck pendant that choses incredibly strange hills to die on and isn't even right in applying the arguments he's trying to apply. Baffling. Like he doesn't even think this should be legal? He just thinks it should be illegal for a different reason? Except thats not even correct because the "defemation and libel" he cites IS ITSELF ABUSE OF A CHILD like god just thinking about how absurd these arguments are is blowing my brain away .