• futatorius@lemm.ee
    ·
    5 months ago

    "Massive majority."

    "Gaza costs Starmer."

    So is that the spin now? Labour has failed because it didn't win 500 seats?

    And I say this as someone disgusted by Starmer's policy on Gaza. But let's face it, it's painfully evident that it's not the most important issue for most voters.

    • PortugueseDragon [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      Labour had fewer votes in this election than in either of the last two, that's what Gaza's "cost" was to them.

    • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      The headline is cope, but it has abolsutley cost them seats and more importantly this is genuinely a victory of electoral-only, low-turnout, geneuinely unique (in terms of other parties) FPTP math. Labour's landslide isn't based on an increase of voters, nor popularity, and a ridiculous amount of even cabinet ministers wins were razor thin. The average margin of votes won by also more than halved. It's going to be a shitshow when the honeymoon is over.