Idk if North Vietnam had the same diplomatic relations. Was South Vietnam considered a seceded sovereign state at the Paris Peace accords?
Idk if North Vietnam had the same diplomatic relations. Was South Vietnam considered a seceded sovereign state at the Paris Peace accords?
my shoot from the hip answer after listening to Season 3 of blowback a few years ago is that the US is the main force against a unified Korea, even conceptually, because it has consistently been the case that the DPRK would emerge as the dominant political project in any "clash" or even completely peaceful and equitable re-integration. the imperialist puppet is a highly dysfunctional organization riddled with gangsters, grifters, property bubbles, and bizarre right-wing cultists who claim supernatural powers. not to mention the various capital formations of chinilpa and their descendants.
without the US presence to bolster the puppet's security apparatus (which was an overt military dictatorship until 1987) and guarantee lines of credit, it would probably fold under the near immediate civil unrest that would follow any left-shift of "acceptable discourse" about worker rights, housing reform, universal education, etc. if you want to read about some fucked up people, look up every "president" of the ROK before the June Struggle of 1987. after isn't exactly great, but prior to that is like a rogue's gallery of the most obvious ghouls and goblins. generals, removed, literal hitler-stans, japan-born occupation collaborators. the Korean War wasn't forgotten in the US for no reason... even the most cursory skimming of what happened then and ever since is generally damning to the US' role and involvement. so usually the focus in the west is on how "kooky" the north is for like... not being in thrall to an industry that makes people surgically and chemically reconfigure their faces and bodies and perform on stage to normalize and induce the practice of cosmetic surgery more broadly in the labor and "matchmaking" market.
but i digress...
the US maintains its relevance by portraying the DPRK as the rogue "other" that its puppet needs protection from and whenever relations between the the north and south warm up, the US ramps up provocations and sanctions or otherwise orchestrates increases in diplomatic tensions, like getting the south korean government to claim control over the entire peninsula in its constitution and require that unification be synonymous with liberalization.
it's the liberal contradictory nonfalsifiable orthodoxy. the DPRK is a dangerous totalitarian communist terrorist state that will destroy other nations around it if the pressure is given up for even a moment; it's also simultaneously a weak, delusional, poverty-stricken kingdom ruled by a corrupt and incompetent ruler which would crumble in hours in a war as the people inside rebelled.
both things cannot be true at the same time but western populations (most especially those in the ROK) must be propagandized to believe it or the US strategy around the DPRK looks nonsensical.