coeliacmccarthy [he/him] to Main • 4 years agolove to spend 25 minutes earnestly defending this person on your leftist podcastimagemessage-square108 fedilinkarrow-up195file-text
arrow-up192imagelove to spend 25 minutes earnestly defending this person on your leftist podcastcoeliacmccarthy [he/him] to Main • 4 years agomessage-square108 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear3arrow-down4·edit-24 years agoSo what’s your point? The implication here is that all Internet posts are inherently misogynistic? The anti-idpol left is the most idpol of all. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear2arrow-down2·4 years agoEarlier you accused me of making a liberal idpol argument, now apparently I'm part of the anti idpol left. Ok. link
minus-squareanonymous_ascendent [none/use name]hexbear2arrow-down1·4 years agoNo I said that Amber would hate that you were using an idpol argument, which you were doing. The pro-Amber contingent of Chapos are the stupidpol social democratic revisionist contingent. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear2arrow-down2·4 years agoMaybe if I was doing whatever you're accusing me of, I wouldn't be so confused by this nonsense. link
So what’s your point? The implication here is that all Internet posts are inherently misogynistic?
The anti-idpol left is the most idpol of all.
Earlier you accused me of making a liberal idpol argument, now apparently I'm part of the anti idpol left. Ok.
No I said that Amber would hate that you were using an idpol argument, which you were doing.
The pro-Amber contingent of Chapos are the stupidpol social democratic revisionist contingent.
Maybe if I was doing whatever you're accusing me of, I wouldn't be so confused by this nonsense.