Pack it up. Nothing can be funnier than this. agony-minion

Or perhaps, nothing can be funny anymore. desolate

  • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
    ·
    1 month ago

    privately owned

    He doesn't own shit in this case, he just had one of his lackeys make whatever LLM he ripped off for his chatbot prompt a Flux server instance. Flux itself is open source, has nothing to do with him or anything he's touched, and runs on midrange consumer hardware. It's also as horrifying as it is fascinating, because despite only a modest increase in system requirements over Stable Diffusion it's starting to lack the really obvious flaws that earlier models have.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 month ago

      He doesn't have any financial stake in what he calls "Grok"? (fuck that name and fuck the novel it comes from btw, Heinlein was a creepy fascist no matter the "separate art from artist" excuses)

      • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don't know what Grok is under the hood, because it doesn't make sense for it to be its own independent model over just a modified version of some other presumably open source LLM that had permissive enough licensing for a derivative work to not mention it (or his lackeys just ripped one off and didn't credit it at all), but the image generator that it's prompting is just a Flux instance. So basically one of his lackeys set up some servers running something like comfyui (also open source) servers set to its remote API mode and got his chatbot to send API calls to them on request, and those servers are just running some basic workflow with the default Flux checkpoint.

        I just want to emphasize that here he's trying to leach off open source research tech that he doesn't own and isn't involved with in any way.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          1 month ago

          I just want to emphasize that here he's trying to leach off open source research tech that he doesn't own and isn't involved with in any way.

          Doesn't sound that much different than a long tradition of billionaire fucks slapping their name and their rebranding labels over stuff they didn't make and don't even fully understand.

          • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
            ·
            1 month ago

            Exactly. Flux isn't his and has nothing to do with him or his shitty companies and bumbling lackeys, he's just a middleman trying to grift off open source tech.

            Extremely horrifying open source tech, but open source tech nonetheless.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              hexagon
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think I understand. Still hate it, but I think I understand anyway.

              Reminds me of how "deepfakes" are sort of home grown and open source creep shit now.

              • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yep. With a relatively modern midrange computer and the most basic of technical knowledge anyone can set up and run at least Stable Diffusion (and if they have an NVidia GPU "relatively modern" extends back to like the better 10 series cards from over a decade ago) and do basically anything with it, limited primarily by their VRAM and RAM vs the image size.

                The one saving grace is that despite how trivially accessibly extremely powerful tools are, most of the AI enthusiast community is comprised of dipshit chuds who struggle to operate a simple prompt input box on something like A1111 and cry about how hard and confusing comfyui - which is literally just a node based flowchart that holds your hand through the whole process - is to use.

                • UlyssesT [he/him]
                  hexagon
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Sounds like there's absolutely no means to restrict deepfaking, including deepfaking of children. What could go wrong? libertarian-alert

                  • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    At this point there's no putting the brakes on it, no. All the tools someone could ever need already exist and either have a broad use (basic computer hardware) or are free programs and relatively small model weight files - wiping out image generating AI at this point would be like trying to wipe out media piracy.

                    And it's only going to get worse as the relatively crude and inefficient algorithms are improved further. Flux itself required a 3090 or 4090 when it was released because of its extremely high VRAM requirements, and now after just a few weeks people have managed to squeeze it down to run on old 10 series cards with 8GB of VRAM. That's a terrifying photorealistic generator running on ancient hardware, even if it doesn't run well.

                    Even though the AI bubble is going to burst because actual tech companies are struggling to monetize shitty proprietary image generators and garbage LLMs with no use value and their investors are getting impatient and annoyed at their losses, the tech itself isn't going anywhere and even if the major tech funding dries up there's a ton of open source independent work being done by enthusiasts.