Difficult to answer your question directly. There are a bunch of leftist historians that did their analysis of what went down, but I haven't read them.
Difficult to have a clear view of what happened exactly and what kind of ideologies existed back then because (1) it was such a messy period without real parties but mainly convenient alliances between opportunists and (2) the revolution became such an important part of the "national narrative", you have to study history to really go beyond the myths.
But you can look into "la Montagne". Apparently many of the lefty historians I talked about consider the fall of Robespierre, their leader, as the end of the revolution. Here is the wikipedia page for what happened while he was in command. He himself ended up under a guillotine. Robespierre's nickname was "the Incorruptible" and here are some of his viewpoints:
Abolish the death penalty and slavery
Universal suffrage as opposed to householder franchise (private property gives you the right to vote)
Including letting Jews, POC and comedians vote
Death to the king, "so that the country lives"
Putting a maximum (decreasing through time) price on bread
He did some shitty things too. Unexpected from a guy leading a millenary monarchy through a revolution.
Was looking up the guy online and saw an opinion piece saying "Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot are of the same mold. They are the characteristic scourges of humanity in modern times, but Robespierre has a good claim to being the first."
Difficult to answer your question directly. There are a bunch of leftist historians that did their analysis of what went down, but I haven't read them.
Difficult to have a clear view of what happened exactly and what kind of ideologies existed back then because (1) it was such a messy period without real parties but mainly convenient alliances between opportunists and (2) the revolution became such an important part of the "national narrative", you have to study history to really go beyond the myths.
But you can look into "la Montagne". Apparently many of the lefty historians I talked about consider the fall of Robespierre, their leader, as the end of the revolution. Here is the wikipedia page for what happened while he was in command. He himself ended up under a guillotine. Robespierre's nickname was "the Incorruptible" and here are some of his viewpoints:
He did some shitty things too. Unexpected from a guy leading a millenary monarchy through a revolution.
Was looking up the guy online and saw an opinion piece saying "Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot are of the same mold. They are the characteristic scourges of humanity in modern times, but Robespierre has a good claim to being the first."
You get the idea.