You can't literally see lights from space or whatever. If somewhere had less coverage on google maps you wouldn't think it's uninhabited, but for some reason, people irl seem to be constantly referring to this image as though it's a literal picture. Mostly for 'civilized' reasons, but also light pollution and just other stuff. Maybe this just made the rounds on reddit or something?

  • Esoteir [he/him]
    ·
    2 months ago

    i uhh, i thought you could see the lights from space?

    https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/SearchPhotos/photo.pl?mission=ISS028&roll=E&frame=33400

    • Awoo [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Those are taken with an 8-20 second shutter speed which takes in considerably more light. In some cases they actually take several dozen photos in the same spot then stitch them together as one picture, this brings out light considerably more than it is visible usually.

      Here's live video, you will see little to no light: https://youtu.be/DfEr5XCFNWM

      • Esoteir [he/him]
        ·
        2 months ago

        that's more bc of the poor quality the ISS main cam is versus the new EHDC camera, you can see lights at night on the higher res livestream camera

        Show

        • Abracadaniel [he/him]
          ·
          2 months ago

          exactly. it takes quite a few seconds of exposure for most cameras to match a human eye's low-light perception.

        • Awoo [she/her]
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes but this is still a tiny amount of light compared to the composite images and slow shutter speed images intended to capture light. It's the same technique as photographing epic pictures of stars and galaxies in the night sky.

          • Esoteir [he/him]
            ·
            2 months ago

            okay but i was replying to OP saying you literally can't see them from space and you can?

            you could use the same argument about the aurora borealis, just because it's darker in person doesn't mean you can't see it

            • Awoo [she/her]
              ·
              2 months ago

              I wasn't trying to be rude, sorry if I came off that way.

              • Esoteir [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                it's all good, i think i took your reply in the wrong way, so i'm sorry about that. I was replying to OP saying you can't see the lights from space, so I took the correction as an "um, actually you can't, you can only really see them in a camera picture", where after rereading, I think you were more responding to me responding to OP's entire post and saying that it would only look like the same brightness as the composite image with the high shutter speeds getting an exposure probably higher than the human eye could get, which is a fair assumption

                that being said i just looked at the first ISS picture I posted again and you can see the metadata, which has it at a shutter speed of one second so shrug-outta-hecks

    • Abracadaniel [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      city lights are most definitely visible from low earth orbit. astronauts aboard the ISS have said as much.

    • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]
      ·
      2 months ago

      looks like there's a lot of oil/gas wells in that region, they might have a lot of big lights set up for nighttime operations

      • BoxedFenders [any, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 months ago

        It still seems way bigger than their energy production would require. That area is larger than all of Central Europe and just as brightly lit with a tiny fraction of the population.

        • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]
          ·
          2 months ago

          to add to @Chronicon@hexbear.net's comment, that region is quite far north and the image is mercator projection. the size is significantly exaggerated relative to lower latitudes, and 6 months of the year it's "nighttime" so any industrial operations will need to be well lit.

          • Chronicon [they/them]
            ·
            2 months ago

            oh wow can't believe I didn't even think of the fact that its like, arctic circle territory and spends so much of the year in darkness.

        • Chronicon [they/them]
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean, when has the fossil fuel industry ever cared about wasting energy or light pollution?

          Here's a satellite view of like a 50km square (very ballpark) area:

          Show

          every one of those white spots is some sort of extraction site, an oil/gas well, or a mine, or whatever, probably like 5 football fields in area minimum, and probably all brightly lit 24/7

    • Chronicon [they/them]
      ·
      2 months ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamalo-Nenets_Autonomous_Okrug

      looks like its this area. Lots of resource extraction going on