Here is the Text for people that dont want to go to reddit.world

spoiler

Hi, everyone. A lot has happened here over the last couple days, and I’ll try to explain both what has been happening and what I’m doing to hopefully fix some of the damage that’s been done. Hopefully these actions can restore even a fraction of the goodwill that we previously had with the wider Lemmy community.

What’s happened

Beaver was recently reinstated as a moderator after finding herself at the center of the recent controversy where Lemmy administrator Rooki unjustly and unilaterally interfered with /c/vegan over a discussion surrounding cat food. I was made a moderator after that same controversy when naeva resigned and went to VeganTheoryClub, an instance defederated from Lemmy.World which is designed to be a haven for discussion of vegan food, activism, art, etc. Things were generally cooling down from that over the last week.

A couple days ago, Beaver began posting to /c/vegan with remarkable frequency (~15 posts/day). Not long after, /u/ccunning contacted me asking about why they had been banned for Rule 5, which is our rule against bad-faith arguments against veganism. ccunning is a member of this community, they might even be vegan, and I’ve never seen them to be anything but mild-mannered and supportive of veganism here. Because I could find no violation, I assumed it was an accident and unbanned them. Very shortly thereafter, ccunning informed me that they had been banned again, and Beaver messaged me in private stating that ccunning had been banned for downvoting vegan comments but encouraging me not to mention that fact publicly. A post on /c/unpopularopinion soon made it apparent that many people were being banned here for this same reason, and taking a look at the mod log, I saw dozens of bans by Beaver whose only stated reason was “Rule 5”.

Beaver continued posting and continued banning, and I messaged them asking if the /c/vegan moderators could have a team-wide discussion and vote concerning this interpretation of Rule 5. I made it clear to them that I felt uncomfortable with their behavior and felt it was doing harm to the community. Beaver ignored this request and simply responded to something else I’d said. 12 hours ago, they stickied a post to the top of /c/vegan daring the admins to interfere, a reference to the previous incident involving Rooki.

here is a post about his in the evil version of the dunktank in lemmyca

Show

funny how most of the praise is from world carnists

  • ButtBidet [he/him]
    ·
    5 days ago

    From my limited knowledge of this situation, I still can't tell who the bad guy is.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Get the popcorn with margarine out!

    I could wrong about this because I don't know those users and am missing context, but that sort of shit (you know, "dae le epic drama amirite, I am above it all atop a tower of solid irony, people upset pleases me, dance for me, top kek") getting said in general forum posting almost always sets off some background noise on this device for some reason. hitler-detector

  • a_little_red_rat [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    4 days ago

    It's good to ban people over their mass downvoting actually, ccmv

    especially in comms that are easy targets for trolls, like vegan or trans comms

  • NewAcctWhoDis [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Why the fuck is there a picture of non-vegan food in that thread?