UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended his handling of gifts from a key Labour donor as he sought to take the edge off a controversy that has cast a shadow over his early weeks in office.
Starmer faces a potential parliamentary investigation after the Sunday Times reported
he initially failed to declare that Waheed Alli, a member of the House of Lords, paid for a personal shopper, designer garments and alterations for his wife, Victoria. But the premier told reporters traveling with him to Italy on Monday that he was “very consistent with following the rules.”
“My team, soon after the election, sought advice on what to do from the relevant authorities, and then had to seek further advice, which is what led to the declaration,” Starmer told reporters in Rome after meeting Italian premier, Giorgia Meloni, on Monday. “Wherever there are gifts from anyone, I’m going to comply with rules.”
Starmer is trying to draw a line under negative press surrounding Alli’s role in Labour’s early days in government. The premier has already come under pressure to explain why the TV mogul, who was named Labour’s chair of general election fund-raising in 2022, was given a 10 Downing St. security pass and also advised on public appointments, as reported by Bloomberg.
Moreover, the prime minister’s failure on Monday to rule out accepting further gifts from Alli opens him up to fresh accusations of hypocrisy from opposition politicians and the British media, given the Labour leader spent much of his time in opposition criticizing the former Conservative administration over its record on ethics and propriety.
Conservative MPs have petitioned the parliamentary commissioner for standards to investigate Starmer’s handling of the donations from Alli. The Survivor television franchise co-creator was appointed to the Lords by then-Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1998 — and has both helped Labour raise a record amount of funds and supported its politicians with his own money.
He has provided tens of thousands of pounds to subsidize the offices of Labour officials while they were in opposition, including giving Starmer £16,200 ($21,400) for “work clothing” in April and allowing Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner to use a New York apartment for a “personal holiday” around New Year’s Eve.
Starmer said the current framework regulating how MPs receive and declare gifts was “good.”
“I asked my team to make sure we’re complying with the framework, which is why they reached out for advice on what to do in this situation,” he said. “When they got further advice they made the declaration. And I think it’s really important everybody else follows the rules.”
The controversy over the Alli donations has coincided with a decline in Starmer’s approval ratings since winning the election, as he’s also faced blow-back over removing winter fuel payments from some pensioners and been accused of painting an overly pessimistic picture of Britain’s economic outlook and prospects.
The prime minister’s declarations while in opposition also show him receiving gifts from other donors of tickets to watch Arsenal play at clubs including Manchester United, Manchester City, Tottenham, West Ham and Wolverhampton Wanderers. The prime minister on Monday sought to justify such gifts on security grounds, alluding to his “massive” support for the North London club.
“I can’t go into the stands because of security reasons. Therefore if I don’t accept a gift of hospitality I can’t go to a game,” Starmer said. “Never going to an Arsenal game again because I can’t accept hospitality is pushing it a bit far,” he said, without explaining why he couldn’t pay for a hospitality ticket himself.
(An earlier version corrected the spelling of Waheed Alli’s name in second paragraph.)
“I can’t go into the stands because of security reasons. Therefore if I don’t accept a gift of hospitality I can’t go to a game,” Starmer said. “Never going to an Arsenal game again because I can’t accept hospitality is pushing it a bit far,” he said, without explaining why he couldn’t pay for a hospitality ticket himself.
Incredible.
I can’t go into the stands because of security reasons.
would have no problem going into the stands
Libs can make the loss of a tiniest of privileges feel like the most massive offense ever.
Yeah God forbid you would trade being able to go to a football game, in exchange for being the Prime Minister
Yeah, sounds about right. Based on current trends, it's around the time the UK needs a new PM.
these fuckin clowns at the top of the shit pile who make crazy money with awesome housing and travel provisions/stipends who do shit like this are just assholes. like how hard is it to just turn it down and buy your own treats while you're in high office, you rich fuck.
also, in the US all this shit is wildly legal for elected assholes if they declare it, generally, and some don't even get in trouble for not declaring it.
Centrist dads who were fuming about Boris Johnson's wallpaper being real quiet on this smh my head