The lawyer also points out that this is a patent infringement lawsuit, not a copyright case
  • buckykat [none/use name]
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hate all patents but game mechanic patents are some of the silliest patents there are

      • buckykat [none/use name]
        ·
        2 days ago

        Their previous game, Craftopia, which I've actually played unlike Palworld, ripped off even more from botw but it was still a very different game. Kinda felt like it was trying to be every possible type of game at once.

  • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
    ·
    2 days ago

    nintendo shouldn't be allowed to sue anyone. I should be allowed to sue the developers of unfunny streambait games that look like shit that i have to hear about for a month.

    • PKMKII [none/use name]
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am announcing a $5 billion lawsuit against Scott Cawthorn over me having to hear countless people say “Do the Freddie Fazbear!”

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    ·
    2 days ago

    Patents are abused all the time. Here's a banger from Apple https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/7/3614506/apple-patents-rectangle-with-rounded-corners

  • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even if this guy isn't the actual lawyer for the case, he's literally still a lawyer, he's not supposed to be imagining shit, his job is to read and reference.

    Also weird that he would reference that Pokemon and Palworld are "such different games" if the actual patents in questions aren't known and if Nintendo have not named Pokemon as the game/franchise that contains the infringed patents.

    The Pokemon connection just seems to be a conclusion people reached because of external similarities, but Nintendo could just be like naming a Zelda or Mario patent too, whatever they think might stick far enough to scare the Palworld lawyers.

  • Deello@lemm.ee
    ·
    2 days ago

    Patents are the reason we don't have mini games during loading screens. The patent is now expired afaik but I guess we just collectively decided we don't care because nobody does it anymore.

    If Nintendo can get a court to side with them, then it is totally worth it for them to own an entire genre. As a consumer/gamer, this sucks. There is a reason this game blew up and it has nothing to do with Nintendo.

  • NuraShiny [any]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who cares at this point? Palworld was the definition flash in the pan. It was fun don't get me wrong, but I am not clamoring to go back any time soon.

    • CarmineCatboy2 [he/him]
      ·
      2 days ago

      It's a big deal because this is a patent lawsuit, not a copyright infringement suit. Nintendo isn't accusing Palworld of breaching Pokémon aesthetically or whatever. They are accusing Palworld of breaching their patent of a gameplay mechanic.

        • CarmineCatboy2 [he/him]
          ·
          2 days ago

          No, from what I'm told its very specifically about a system of item loss upon death / other players can find them / if they do you get them back that Legend of Arceus implemented and which Palworld also uses. Creating the ability to patent troll mechanics that specific would be a bad precedent.

          • ghosts [he/him]
            ·
            2 days ago

            a system of item loss upon death / other players can find them / if they do you get them back

            Pokemon coming for minecraft next???

  • Roonerino [they/them]
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wish them the best of luck in this fight that everyone knew they were signing up for. I wonder if they had enough sense to strip everything of value out of the company already.

  • AernaLingus [any]
    ·
    2 days ago

    I look forward to the inevitable Moon Channel video

  • WhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have to imagine that Nintendo would have listed the infringed patents in their lawsuit. You don't have to imagine anything