• imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    making gambling illegal is harm reduction actually. it's not a direct equivalency with drugs. you can make moonshine in your bathtub without detection, the govt has the power to shut down corporate gambling operations and I would bet ;) that most customers won't bother moving to the underground option. (which can also be shut down much more easily than a drug ring) it is harm reduction. I don't know why so many people feel the need to defend its existence here.

    • bigbrowncommie69 [any]
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not really defending its existence, more trying to figure out what the best solution is.

      I think you have a good point though.

      • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mean banning it like it was what, only a decade ago? That's clearly the best solution. Friendly wagers over the local game don't cause a mass transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich, FanDuel does

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          2 hours ago

          According to "fuck you, got mine" misanthropic fairweather leftists in this thread, if making something illegal doesn't make it go away 100%, it should be completely legal, which includes the massive tech corporation shit that has already made watching professional sports even worse than before and more a vehicle for gambling than for enjoying the games for their own sake.

      • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        yeah sorry I didn't think that was your intention but others in the thread are doing it from what's clearly a latent libertarian mindset.