SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

SETTLERS RIGHT YET AGAIN

  • SadArtemis [she/her]
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Honestly IMO those explanations don't do the issue full justice (or even present half of the picture). Settler-states (like most of the Anglosphere, or Isntreal) have a genuine "labor aristocracy-" one which has always fought to maintain its privileges, through genocidal land grabs, racial exclusion acts and segregation.

    • PKMKII [none/use name]
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Labor aristocracy is a common problem among the working class in WEIRD countries, albeit not insurmountable. My argument wasn’t that labor aristocracy isn’t real. I’m just saying that rather than being a thing the working class adopts entirely independently out of their own agency, it’s something that bourgeois democracy pressures the working class into as an acceptable expression of working class politics in the imperial core.