ethan [none/use name] to Main • 4 years agoNathan J Robinson is reaching levels of cringe previously thought unattainable by normal libsimagemessage-square79 fedilinkarrow-up1113
arrow-up1105imageNathan J Robinson is reaching levels of cringe previously thought unattainable by normal libsethan [none/use name] to Main • 4 years agomessage-square79 Commentsfedilink
minus-squarea_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]hexbear5arrow-down10·4 years agoI mean even if socialism were a "science", which it very much does not want to be, even a relatively uncontroversial Kuhnian analysis wouldn't point toward the necessity of retaining any sort of Marxist intellectual framework. link
minus-squaregammison [none/use name]hexbear15·4 years agoImagine thinking Marx's critique of moralism meant giving up morality. link
minus-squareReversi [none/use name]hexbear14·4 years agoCan't wait to go 200 years into the past to pursue a failed project dismissed even then as a fantasy link
minus-squarea_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]hexbear6arrow-down10·4 years agoAs opposed to dialectical materialism, which is of course, politically ascendant. link
minus-squarea_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]hexbear1arrow-down7·edit-24 years agoOh yeah clearly, which is why we have despair filled doomer posts here every 15 minutes. link
deleted by creator
Reject Science
Return to Utopia
Read Feyerabend.
I mean even if socialism were a "science", which it very much does not want to be, even a relatively uncontroversial Kuhnian analysis wouldn't point toward the necessity of retaining any sort of Marxist intellectual framework.
Imagine thinking Marx's critique of moralism meant giving up morality.
Can't wait to go 200 years into the past to pursue a failed project dismissed even then as a fantasy
As opposed to dialectical materialism, which is of course, politically ascendant.
Actually is though
Oh yeah clearly, which is why we have despair filled doomer posts here every 15 minutes.
Now this is opportunism!