• barrbaric [he/him]
    ·
    28 days ago

    You got a link? Can't really tell what he's trying to say here without context. Is it that the US should just give up because China is owning them so hard on electric cars? Is it that the US is economically dependent on oil and we should continue to use ICE cars regardless of if it kills everyone?

    • plinky [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      28 days ago

      https://xcancel.com/mattyglesias/status/1848412694958813439

      • barrbaric [he/him]
        ·
        28 days ago

        Thanks! So yeah, it's literally just "China is doing good so we must ban electric cars", death to Matty Glesias.

        • Chronicon [they/them]
          ·
          28 days ago

          if you dig a little deeper it's also in large part the fact that matty hates Elon for aligning with republicans: https://cdn.xcancel.com/pic/orig/media%2FGabbWXZXkAA2Uvr.png

    • Hexboare [they/them]
      ·
      27 days ago

      My reading was that the US has an technical advantage in ICE [doubt] so shouldn't have supported EVs which allowed China to gain ground at an early stage of the technology

      Which is fucking stupid, of course

    • darkcalling [comrade/them, she/her]
      ·
      27 days ago

      It's predicated on the old racist trope that Chinese steal everything and cannot invent anything of their own because both they are asiatic hordes and also communism no iphone. So it holds that if we hadn't invented them, they couldn't have stolen it and raced ahead of our plodding efforts and our existing advantage in ICE would be too great (by decades) for them to overcome from their starting position. Which is of course wrong, laughably so.