You make a really strong counter argument. Maybe I got too much acid Marxism in my brain but I feel like the problem is reduceable to fundamental forces . If you want to make changes it requires energy. Anarchism is like increasing the pressure in a gas, it can be used to do work, however it is a low density process. MLM vanguard action is like a crystalline solid. So if you wanted to destroy jeff bezor for example, you could hit him with tens of thousands of psi in gass. that would work. Or a steel guilline blade. The goal is the the same, the results are the same. The issue is how much energy are you spending on achieving the goal, and how much waste heat do you have to generate and deal with.
Similar would creating a popular front mass movement require fantastic forces to get the work done. However I can build a guillotine with the tools and materials I got in the back shed. As maintain the oppressions of capitalisms requires the energy of many people, simply cutting off that flow will more efferently achieve the goal. Do I need to try again when I am more sober or does analyzing theory through the lens of consequential utilitarianism not make the true path forward clear?
oh hey it me.
You make a really strong counter argument. Maybe I got too much acid Marxism in my brain but I feel like the problem is reduceable to fundamental forces . If you want to make changes it requires energy. Anarchism is like increasing the pressure in a gas, it can be used to do work, however it is a low density process. MLM vanguard action is like a crystalline solid. So if you wanted to destroy jeff bezor for example, you could hit him with tens of thousands of psi in gass. that would work. Or a steel guilline blade. The goal is the the same, the results are the same. The issue is how much energy are you spending on achieving the goal, and how much waste heat do you have to generate and deal with.
Similar would creating a popular front mass movement require fantastic forces to get the work done. However I can build a guillotine with the tools and materials I got in the back shed. As maintain the oppressions of capitalisms requires the energy of many people, simply cutting off that flow will more efferently achieve the goal. Do I need to try again when I am more sober or does analyzing theory through the lens of consequential utilitarianism not make the true path forward clear?