I could go on and on about Adrian Zenz, his terrible methodologies; about terrorist groups trained by Isis and utilized by American for creating unrest in Xinjiang; stats about real population numbers in Xinjiang; about differences between American and Chinese anti-terror efforts regarding radical islamic terror groups; about infrastructure building in the area, investment by China; about the number of mosques per capita; about the preservation of regional identity that Xi is working towards; etc. Etc.
But, regardless, just saying that I don't believe that there is religious persecution in Xinjiang means, in their eyes, that I don't care about our Muslim brothers and sisters.
It's similar to talking about Hong Kong.
Libs use these places as tools to spread liberalism, so caring about the actual policies, people, and reality is a disadvantage to conversation.
How can I approach these subjects?
No one with access to this site knows for sure what "the truth" is, but given that inmate labor is pretty common in China (as it is in a lot of the world), and that the administrators in charge of these sites would stand to benefit materially from using the labor of the people under their control, our default assumption certainly shouldn't be "It's not happening." If even 20% of what's reported in Western media is true, then there's definitely a lot of forced labor happening.
But I don't ask that anyone believe anything in Western media, just that the next time someone here drops a 5000-word post sourced entirely from Chinese state media, random people on twitter, and the same two or three journalists, we treat those sources with the the same healthy skepticism we would level at the NYT.