The ejidos and agrarian communities are the form of land tenure that covers most of the surface in the Mexican countryside; these offer important agricultural and livestock production and most of the hills, forest areas, mangroves, coasts, water, mines and various natural attractions are in their lands

The ejido in Mexico

Mainly associated with the revolutionary agrarian reform, which projected the agrarian law of 1915 as collective, undivided land that could not be sold or inherited. Throughout the 20th century, its legislation underwent various changes, in accordance with the economic and political projects of the governments in power.

The key element to understanding the introduction of ejidos in Mexico as an integral part of the laws that followed the Mexican Revolution is the historical context in which the country found itself. Historian Emilio Kouri, in his article “The Invention of the Ejido”, speaks of the ejido as a social result of the Mexican armed struggle that was the revolution, but rather as a temporary response to the social demands of the revolution.

“That a revolution destroys what is unjust or does not work in order to try something new and different -with or without success- is the usual thing, and in the case of Mexico the agrarian reform of the Revolution invented the ejido. There should be no doubt that it is a modern invention, as will be seen below. The ejido was born as a provisional, almost accidental arrangement, but in less than two decades it was consolidated as the main instrument for governmental redistribution of land (...).

However, the ejido became a major piece in the policy of agrarian distribution in Mexico, more as a political tool to establish rural peace after the fall of Porfiriato than as an effective tool to fulfill the demands of the peasants; for the post-revolutionary war period, these aspects of communal restitution and indigenous property spaces provided by the creation of the ejidos resulted in a practical policy of control. In this regard, Kourí also mentions in his article the following:

“Thus, for both political and historical reasons, the solution to the agrarian problem at that time was clear: communal property was what the humblest people of the countryside (the Indians above all) understood best, what was most convenient to their present needs and, moreover, apparently, what the Zapatistas in arms on the other side of the Ajusco said they wanted(...).

January 6 marks a century since, in the midst of a great civil war, the Carrancista faction enacted an agrarian law in Veracruz that unintentionally marked the beginning and course of the most extensive agrarian reform in the modern history of Latin America. Throughout more than seven decades, the governments emanating from the Revolution gave way to an enormous transformation of the legal order and the social distribution of rural property in Mexico.

Pushed first by the demands and struggles of new peasant organizations and soon also by the irresistible attraction of its clientelist potential, the Revolution ended up distributing a lot of land, and not only bad land. Cardenismo (assisted by the Great Depression) broke up a good part of the large haciendas, demolishing without a second thought a long-lived economic and social institution that symbolized not only the consolidation of territorial property and local power since the mid-19th century, but also the legacy of conquests, subjections and viceregal depredations.

By 1991, when the Constitution was amended to put an end to the repartition, more than two-thirds of Mexico's land and forests had been subject to agrarian reform. There is much to debate about the costs and benefits, the vices and virtues, or the aspirations and failures of the Revolution's land distribution, but in any case, what is certain is that the magnitude of that institutional change in land ownership is comparable only to that which occurred as a result of the Spanish conquest in the sixteenth century.

El ejido, símbolo de la Revolución Mexicana*

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • SoylentSnake [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    7 days ago

    no fucking clue how to attempt to dare 'normies'

    if ur gonna try the apps consider premium hinge and filter for "other" politics, assuming you live in a big city that almost always means some type of anti-capitalist. they might have normie features in other respects but they're at least gonna be weird on politics, and ive found the odds of them being some other type of freak/weirdo and open to same is higher in this demographic as well. that's also assuming hinge is popular in KKKlanada, idk if the app landscape is different over there.

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I will never use the apps and I especially will never pay for the apps and I can't afford to pay for the apps anyway. I can barely stand normal social media and making a profile seems like a nightmare. I hate describing myself, I know myself too well for that. Disco Stu doesn't advertise. I really don't like increasing how many websites have my personal info, photos etc

      Edit: lack of third spaces is a fuck cause I'm really charming irl. I wouldn't say this about myself if I haven't been told so pretty openly by over 5 people. I don't think I am. I just like people an am good at jokes.

      • SoylentSnake [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        7 days ago

        feel ya cousin i really hate the apps even though i met one person who meant something to me off of them. they can be a necessary evil depending on your situation though. but if they r a no go, maybe just focus on expanding your social circle beynd the punk scene more holistically then? find hobby groups, join an org and do some organizing (dating shouldn't be your goal in either ofc (especially organizing), but just as a way to branch out in general and any dating w/in would be a bonus).

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
          ·
          7 days ago

          Orgs are also the punk scene and well, they do.the on the ground stuff we like anarchists for and are also personally the 'online anarchists' we've canonized into.being a strictly online phenomenon and use the word tankie as a pejorative with no irony. I've got my organizational niche kinda already cut out in helping the homeless since I'm legit friends with a lot but that's sorta me and a few friends and we've been homeless, the two that arent me work in shelters. We're already known former street dudes who moved up to standard poverty so it's been way more effective as a means of outreach in kinds incognito coordination with the places they work and cause the shelter system can be a fuck, occasionally against. I have a pretty okay non romantic social life and am not like...goal oriented about a relationship, I'd just like to watch stare trek and cuddle with someone from time to time.

          • SoylentSnake [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            7 days ago

            anarchists r a land of contrasts thinky-felix but yeah i getcha, the handful of anarchist friends and acquaintances ive had have def shown there's more uh....genuine ideological daylight between us than we sometimes like to think on chapo dot chat. god bless'em for doing good on the ground work though.

            yeah idk it's hard my friend. no magic bullet to finding luv. year and a half out from a divorce-lite and i don't feel like i have any more answers really.