The ejidos and agrarian communities are the form of land tenure that covers most of the surface in the Mexican countryside; these offer important agricultural and livestock production and most of the hills, forest areas, mangroves, coasts, water, mines and various natural attractions are in their lands

The ejido in Mexico

Mainly associated with the revolutionary agrarian reform, which projected the agrarian law of 1915 as collective, undivided land that could not be sold or inherited. Throughout the 20th century, its legislation underwent various changes, in accordance with the economic and political projects of the governments in power.

The key element to understanding the introduction of ejidos in Mexico as an integral part of the laws that followed the Mexican Revolution is the historical context in which the country found itself. Historian Emilio Kouri, in his article “The Invention of the Ejido”, speaks of the ejido as a social result of the Mexican armed struggle that was the revolution, but rather as a temporary response to the social demands of the revolution.

“That a revolution destroys what is unjust or does not work in order to try something new and different -with or without success- is the usual thing, and in the case of Mexico the agrarian reform of the Revolution invented the ejido. There should be no doubt that it is a modern invention, as will be seen below. The ejido was born as a provisional, almost accidental arrangement, but in less than two decades it was consolidated as the main instrument for governmental redistribution of land (...).

However, the ejido became a major piece in the policy of agrarian distribution in Mexico, more as a political tool to establish rural peace after the fall of Porfiriato than as an effective tool to fulfill the demands of the peasants; for the post-revolutionary war period, these aspects of communal restitution and indigenous property spaces provided by the creation of the ejidos resulted in a practical policy of control. In this regard, Kourí also mentions in his article the following:

“Thus, for both political and historical reasons, the solution to the agrarian problem at that time was clear: communal property was what the humblest people of the countryside (the Indians above all) understood best, what was most convenient to their present needs and, moreover, apparently, what the Zapatistas in arms on the other side of the Ajusco said they wanted(...).

January 6 marks a century since, in the midst of a great civil war, the Carrancista faction enacted an agrarian law in Veracruz that unintentionally marked the beginning and course of the most extensive agrarian reform in the modern history of Latin America. Throughout more than seven decades, the governments emanating from the Revolution gave way to an enormous transformation of the legal order and the social distribution of rural property in Mexico.

Pushed first by the demands and struggles of new peasant organizations and soon also by the irresistible attraction of its clientelist potential, the Revolution ended up distributing a lot of land, and not only bad land. Cardenismo (assisted by the Great Depression) broke up a good part of the large haciendas, demolishing without a second thought a long-lived economic and social institution that symbolized not only the consolidation of territorial property and local power since the mid-19th century, but also the legacy of conquests, subjections and viceregal depredations.

By 1991, when the Constitution was amended to put an end to the repartition, more than two-thirds of Mexico's land and forests had been subject to agrarian reform. There is much to debate about the costs and benefits, the vices and virtues, or the aspirations and failures of the Revolution's land distribution, but in any case, what is certain is that the magnitude of that institutional change in land ownership is comparable only to that which occurred as a result of the Spanish conquest in the sixteenth century.

El ejido, símbolo de la Revolución Mexicana*

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • john_browns_beard [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    One of my coworkers is extremely energetic and chatty this morning, he can be difficult to tolerate on a good day and I slept like shit so I don't want to interact with anyone. Dude mumbles a lot and talks like twice as fast as a normal human, he also will ask a question and then starts asking a new one while you're in the middle of explaining the last, it's absolutely kryptonite for someone with ADHD. I can feel the energy draining from my brain when he is talking to me.

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    The vegan product of my day's vegan labor

    Spicy garlic ginger edamame, ginger tofu ramen w/ mushrooms, and miso braised cabbage

    Show

  • SoylentSnake [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    okay forreal a somewhat extended solo drinking break starts today, forreal actually forreal this time!! accepting tips and tricks from any fellow problem-drinkers-to-alcoholics-trying-to-improve, sound off!! (don't suggest tea though i really kinda just don't like tea at all)

  • Mokey2 [none/use name]
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I hate when you can see someone get special attention because someone is horny for them.

    I feel like it's disrespectful towards yourself and the person youre objectifying.

    I'm not jealous, I feel like I have people who care about me and love me but I feel a little bit grossed out/pity when I see it.

  • homhom9000 [she/her]
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Manager will be back 2 weeks sooner than originally planned. That won't be enough time for my planned coup. I'll sit back in the mountains until I get another chance to strike

  • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Do y'all think The Wretched of the Earth is sufficient to answer the National Question in an introductory reading list, or is it necessary to include a work like Foundations of Leninism or Marxism and the National Question? My goal is to avoid linking Stalin because this list is oriented towards liberals, and even including Stalin's name once will scare many people who otherwise could read theory and become comrades after de-worming the anti-Communism from their brains anyways.

    Also considering adding Pedagogy of the Oppressed right after Wretched as recommended by 72T.

    Ideally I could force liberals to read as much theory as possible from whomever I want, but I am working with people otherwise skeptical of leftist ideas and trying to help guide radicalization. Think disaffected .worlders.

    (Not linking my list yet again because I've linked it enough here, just want the question answered)

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Gonna roast these, spicy garlic ginger edamame

    Show

    Deep fried tofu to put in my ramen

    Show

    Mushroom ramen broth w/ spinach

    Show