• Isoprenoid@programming.dev
    ·
    11 months ago

    in their nascent stages

    I could argue that we're still in the nascent stages of capitalism. Claiming "nascent stages" is like claiming "but that wasn't real communism. If we did this this way it would be better."

    • Egon [they/them]
      ·
      11 months ago

      I could argue that we're still in the nascent stages of capitalism.

      You could argue that but you'd be wrong, and you'd also fail to engage with the argument the other user gave you. Have you considered you're maybe not such a smart little boy as you think you are? horsepoo-theory

        • Egon [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Glad to hear it! Though I would caution against changing your worldview based on a single interaction. I'd recommend widening your horizon and gathering information in order to have a well-grounded worldview. If you need literature please feel free to ask!

    • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      11 months ago

      We're at least 200 years into capitalism and it's reached the end of its lifespan. As the USSR and now China, DPRK, Cuba, Vietnam, and Laos and some other places demonstrate. Even if they didn't prove that humanity is ready to transition into the next stage of development, we would know that capitalism is on its death bed for one simple reason: if it continues for much longer it will destroy almost all life on the planet. The best thing about capitalism is it's lifespan.

        • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          11 months ago

          No argument there. Just goes to show how destructive it is. Almost like the increasing concentration of capital in fewer and fewer hands with the increasing impoverishment of the masses of workers is a recipe for revolution. We can marvel at how rapid the contradictions within the capitalist mode of production led to it's end.