https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/WEOUpdateJune2020
Capitalism BTFO
Not even so-called "emerging economies" like India, Brazil, Turkey etc are expected to grow
https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/06/24/WEOUpdateJune2020
Capitalism BTFO
Not even so-called "emerging economies" like India, Brazil, Turkey etc are expected to grow
What sources would I be allowed to produce by the hive?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Sure you are
deleted by creator
Go downstairs and ask your mom she sends me your family newsletter at christmas
yanks are fucking weird
Wait wait wait. Family newsletters at christmas? Is that REALLY a thing?
deleted by creator
Family newsletter is what you get when your parents are Trots.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Boooooo what kind of banter is?
deleted by creator
Boring banter?
Let's start with any and go from there
https://www.ft.com/content/961b4b32-3fce-11e9-b896-fe36ec32aece
1 headline that says "The Chinese economy could be 12% smaller than what the official data says" from the financial times. Even if this is accurate how would it disprove that the Chinese economy was growing?
No I’m saying that Chinese economic data is not reliable. Not that any other countries data is reliable either.
Your source said ‘could be 12% less’. It didn’t say ‘no measurement is reliable so let’s chuck the whole lot out—but especially when talking about China’.
If you’ve got a critique of GDP as inaccurate and meaningless, go for it. You’ll find good company here.
Paywall so I found a similar article https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-07/brookings-says-chinas-economy-12-smaller-official-data-show
From the paper that the article cites:
I mean, probably overstating GDP growth by average of 2 percent doesn't seem like compelling evidence for completely disregarding China's GDP numbers.
Link to paper: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ChenEtAl_web.pdf
It genuinely doesn't matter what source you give me. I will judge on the merit of the evidence itself not the commentary of the source.
The question I'm asking is whether this disbelief in their GDP figures is fundamentally based in actual tangible evidence or not.
how about you give any evidence at all or even make a fucking claim you spineless liberal
deleted by creator
Where do you think the imf gets its funding?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Fucking Galaxy Brain Take
Lmao