Permanently Deleted

  • determinism [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I was digging around in the talk page, very little discussion in any case.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Thomas_Sankara

    I looked at the page to see if the criticisms have merit, decided they don't. I did find somethign interesting though.

    There is a chart in the "Criticisms" section with the "Freedom in the World" country ratings indicating that Burkina Faso was "not free" during Sankara's presidency. We all know this is just a bullshit metric, etc, etc. What I thought was interesting was, looking at the document that they cite. http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Country%20Ratings%20and%20Status%2C%201973-2014%20%28FINAL%29.xls

    You can see the previous year had the following designations:

    Year: 1983-1984

    Political Rights: 6

    Civil Liberties: 5

    Status: Partially Free (PF)

    Year: 1984-1985

    Political Rights: 7

    Civil Liberties: 5

    Status: Not Free (NF)

    An increase in political rights and no change in civil liberties (by their own metric) makes the country less free.

    • GothWhitlam [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Yeah, they left out the 'range of Cheetos Mac'n'Cheese flavours available' metric I'm the final paper.

      Sankara are the last flaming barbecue pack as a new years treat in 1984, reducing the flavours to two. According to US metrics, this automatically makes a country 'not free'.