I imagine in terms of medical care access and affordability or welfare stimulus, practically negligible, but in terms of CDC funding, science literacy, public policy, and general preparedness, it would be a whole lot better put together.

So I'd say... 10% fewer deaths? 200K vs. 220K deaths sounds about right.

  • CanYouFeelItMrKrabs [any, he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    capitalism itself that was weak against the virus, doesn’t matter who was in charge.

    There are lots of capitalist countries that are in better situations than the US though