• LangdonAlger [any]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    hispanic also implies of spanish origin which erases a lot of the indigenous culture and identity of latin americans, plus it excludes, like, a brazilian people

    • ekjp [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • Mardoniush [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Is "First Nations" catching on their like in the anglo settler states?

        • wtypstanaccount04 [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I hope it does. So many race terms are bullshit (because race is a social construct). How many times have you met a paper-white person?

          • lvysaur [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            It's also because they were created by whites

        • Polemarchos [none/use name]
          ·
          4 years ago

          That's just going to lead to thousands of mexican elizabeth warrens crawling out of the woodworks.

      • gay [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        There are many and the "appropriate term" changes from one country to another. Aboriginal, indigenous, "original peoples", native nations, pre-columbian nations, the actual name of the nation you're speaking about, a name a group of nations have chosen for themselves. I'm probably missing a few.

    • Skinhn [they/them,any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      So does Latin though, there's a good article online about the colonial project of a 'latin' in the ~1800s

    • JayTwo [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Latin, though, implies European ancestry. Roman empire and whatnot.

      I'm thinking that it's because Latin is the name of both a dead language and a descendent family of languages, not a culture, so it's more like "Spanish speaking america", than Hispaniola's "Spanish America."

      Also, it's Portuguese inclusive, yeah.

      Plus since Latin is a dead language, Latinx people were successfully able to take ownership of the term "Latin". So, when you think someone is "Latin" you don't think of Nero or Cesar or whatever.

      • thelasthoxhaist [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        i see latin mostly refering to the use of a latin language, since latinos have included haiti, however its not perfect since it not includes the guyanas and sometime involves quebec too

        • gay [any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          and sometime involves quebec too

          Take that back.

            • gay [any]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I think that if I heard a Quebecois call themselves "latinx" I would be legally required to spit on their face.

        • JayTwo [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          I've never heard Haitians be referred to as Latino/Latinx. Dominicans, yes, and it's the same island. But not Haitians. I've always heard them be considered "carribean".

          Yes, they would technically be a part of Latin America and therefore Latinx by the logic given. But the fact that they don't seem to be, at least in America, is why I feel like the word Latinx isn't functionally different than the word Hispanic.