Honestly I have to wonder if she was just suggesting something so clearly dystopian and existential-horror-y and just generally icky and fucked up as a way to get a reaction. She argues in the article that using braindead people as surrogates is "morally no different" from organ donation, which makes me feel like the idea is intended more as a sort of commentary on the morality of organ donation, as opposed to an actual sincere suggestion.
Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837
That does raise a somewhat interesting ethical conversation, I suppose.
IF donating all your organs after death is a good thing and IF donating your body to "science" might also be a good thing (we're gonna ignore people's bodies being sent to firing and explosives ranges instead of medical research and teaching)... would having your entire body being used for a single purpose (after being declared brain dead) be socially acceptable? A purpose such as, an biological artificial(?) womb.
Would society be very weird about the children born (produced?) this way like it was in the USA for at least several decades?
![[CW: Misogyny] "I don't hate women, I just see them as objects."](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/03175295-89cf-41bf-b8e4-f4778e548591.webp){kind=link}
I know there's a bimbofication joke in here somewhere but my brain can't get over the existential horror to find it
Honestly I have to wonder if she was just suggesting something so clearly dystopian and existential-horror-y and just generally icky and fucked up as a way to get a reaction. She argues in the article that using braindead people as surrogates is "morally no different" from organ donation, which makes me feel like the idea is intended more as a sort of commentary on the morality of organ donation, as opposed to an actual sincere suggestion.
Sent from Mdewakanton Dakota lands / Sept. 29 1837
Treaty with the Sioux of September 29th, 1837
"We Will Talk of Nothing Else": Dakota Interpretations of the Treaty of 1837
That does raise a somewhat interesting ethical conversation, I suppose.
IF donating all your organs after death is a good thing and IF donating your body to "science" might also be a good thing (we're gonna ignore people's bodies being sent to firing and explosives ranges instead of medical research and teaching)... would having your entire body being used for a single purpose (after being declared brain dead) be socially acceptable? A purpose such as, an biological artificial(?) womb.
Would society be very weird about the children born (produced?) this way like it was in the USA for at least several decades?