she even liked the comment lmao

  • the_river_cass [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    what politicians do when a bill has no hope of passing and what they do when it has a real chance of becoming law are two very different things

    • cracksmoke2020 [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 years ago

      Except the bill passed, it's just that Trump vetoed it.

      I don't know why it's hard for you to believe that the two political parties have oppositional views on foreign policy, in particular oppositional views that are both still relevant to broader empire building (where the difference is whose empire is being built).

      There is a relevant geopolitical case to make about not wanting Saudi to be a complete hegemon within the middle east as it relates to the further entranchment of pax americana. The same applies with China and broader global liberalization efforts.

      • the_river_cass [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Except the bill passed, it’s just that Trump vetoed it.

        this is precisely my point. bills make it out of congress for political theater reasons all the time in order for the president to veto it. look at all the times republicans put ACA repeal in front of Obama, then virtually collapsed trying to do the same after Trump took office.

        don't confuse theater for actual commitment. Yemen started under Obama.

        • cracksmoke2020 [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          The house successful overrided the veto and the Senate missed it by fairly small margin of votes. There's substantial bipartisan support for ending this shit, and the killing of Jamaal Kashogi does play a meaningful role in why democrats have flipped their position on Saudi Arabia expanding their power.