I disagree that they are analogous in their social effect/praxis. Luigi, whatever faults in his posting, had the foresight to make sure his message wasn't muddle by killing randos.
It's at the level of effect that things actually matter.
Were most Americans ever on the unabomber's side? No.
Were most Americans ever on the unabomber's side? No.
you'd be shocked tbh, even at the time the msm editorials agreed with some of his points. he was an awful and vehemently fascist crackkker but the general populace didnt disagree with his general ramblings about "industrial" ""society"", thats just revisionism
I disagree that they are analogous in their social effect/praxis. Luigi, whatever faults in his posting, had the foresight to make sure his message wasn't muddle by killing randos.
It's at the level of effect that things actually matter.
Were most Americans ever on the unabomber's side? No.
you'd be shocked tbh, even at the time the msm editorials agreed with some of his points. he was an awful and vehemently fascist crackkker but the general populace didnt disagree with his general ramblings about "industrial" ""society"", thats just revisionism
On second thoughts, I change my mind. He def injured, and disabled some people in the process. I guess my vulgar analysis was inappropriate.