Nuclear energy good

  • Fakename_Bill [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Which are the better currently-available options for battery-based large-scale storage of energy generated by wind and solar?

    Obviously non-battery options like pumped storage exist, but this requires very specific geographic features to be practical, and can't be done everywhere.

    • StolenStalin [comrade/them,they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Well for one, pumping water uphill during the day using solar/whatever. And then at night the pumps become hydroelectric turbines as the water flows back down.

        • StolenStalin [comrade/them,they/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yeah didnt read my bad. Another system could be compressing air/some other gas. During the day and using the compressed gas to turn a turbine.

          • Fakename_Bill [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            In theory that sounds like a pretty good option, but in the 30 seconds or so it took to type this reply obviously I couldn't research it lol

            • StolenStalin [comrade/them,they/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I mean idk if it exists. Energy storage just means potential energy creation/efficient extraction. Could put a huge heavy fucking weight and lift it up a tower. Then letting it spin motors (maybe some gearing so weight moves slow while turbine spins fast as it falls. Problem with everything is just optimizing efficiency.

    • Fourny [he/him,comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      The non battery options are often the most cost effective when available. For batteries the molten salt ones look really promising; they are huge and run hot but are very cheap per kWh. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten-salt_battery