Edit: Damn, did not expect this to turn into today’s struggle sesh.
Here’s my both sides/both sides take. Should people be executed for drawing, publishing or showing hateful cartoons? Probably not.
What grosses me out is how Enlightened Secular France has spent centuries colonizing and brutalizing muslims and continues to oppress them with discriminatory laws while acting like the entire point of Free Speech TM is the right to degrade a profoundly marginalized minority.
As someone brought up in this thread, the whole Mohammad cartoon controversy reminds me of the perennial debate “why would a black person get violent if you call them the n-word, it’s just a word.” Context matters, when you purposely provoke an oppressed minority by shoving the thing they find most offensive in their face, you may get a violent reaction.
I don’t think this guy deserves to die at all, but Charlie Hebdo is very racist and it’s gross how people rally around it like it’s this bastion of free speech.
That said, death to A Wyatt Mann. Inshallah.
That's absolutely batshit insane. I do not fucking know why the French continue to decide that the hill they want to die on is hating refugees and Muslims, instead of something more noble like humiliating Macron and getting him kicked out of office
It's the clearest example of Hegelian dialectics in play.
Thesis: Conservatives who hate Muslims for not being Christian.
Antithesis: Radlibs who hate Muslims for not embodying European Enlightenment values
Synthesis: Pretending to be opposed to all religion, but only caring when its Muslims.
deleted by creator
Mmh... idk, maybe because your vision of what « the French » is is wrong?
The (((french))) are those people in Europe that cooka da meatball, right?
Well they are mostly white...