• Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump is making it about water rights and complaining that farmers didn’t get enough water because of ecological regulations.

      • Pavlichenko_Fan_Club [comrade/them]
        ·
        2 days ago

        As always. Also the governor of California already promised to waive environmental review so they could 'rebuild faster'--seriously ironic liberal brainrot.

        • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]
          ·
          2 days ago

          Environmental reviews of the sort like exposure to hazards, such as, to take an example at random, wildfires? Is Los Angeles urban development about to end up on a 10-year cycle?

    • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its crazy because every right winger is talking about LA running out of water which is obviously untrue. Most angelenos (except maybe those in actively byrning or burnt areas) still has clean water coming from their tap. And more importantly, we all see water drop after water drop on the TV coverage. The actual crews fighting the fire havent indicated any trouble getting water and there are dozens of reservoirs available.

      • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah but if the almond trees had more water they wouldn’t be as dry (in January) and wouldn’t have caught flame. That’s trump’s argument lmao, it’s so stupid it’s unbelievable. The fire didn’t spread cross farms it spread across forest, suburban housing developments and rough hills

        • Cimbazarov [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yea that's what I don't get a out his whole "I told Newsom to sweep the leaves from the forests" because I thought this fire started in the urban area