wtvrell99 [any] to main • edit-24 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square18 fedilinkarrow-up175file-text
arrow-up175external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashwtvrell99 [any] to main • edit-24 years agomessage-square18 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareNagarjuna [he/him]hexbear7·4 years agoThis is arguing that slavery in early states, like 5000 years ago lead to markets which are distinct from capitalism which is rule by capitalists. That said, slavery was one of the forms primitive accumulation took in N. America and so slavery did evolve into capitalism. link
minus-squareWhodonedidit [he/him,comrade/them]hexbear2·4 years agoWell perhaps it's best to read the source material for yourself and make a judgment from there instead of arguing over snippets of arguments out of context. I think that would better serve a non-ideological material analysis of the subject, no? link
deleted by creator
Can you explain?
deleted by creator
This is arguing that slavery in early states, like 5000 years ago lead to markets which are distinct from capitalism which is rule by capitalists.
That said, slavery was one of the forms primitive accumulation took in N. America and so slavery did evolve into capitalism.
deleted by creator
Well perhaps it's best to read the source material for yourself and make a judgment from there instead of arguing over snippets of arguments out of context. I think that would better serve a non-ideological material analysis of the subject, no?
deleted by creator
Just a suggestion, friend