Who talks about the conflict without harassing Hamas for their actions and counter revolutionary activity, who is silent about Puerto Rico, who is silent about catalonia, South Sudan, Rojava, who is willing to sacrifice LGBTQ for a 'revolutionary struggle', who is idealistic on the analysis of the history and the material conditions in the places is not actual consistent revolutionary, but a particularist.
While I agree that aoc could be better isolating the sentence into two factoids:
And saying anyone who holds them combined, or even just holds 1 is social fascist etc. might be problematic.
Who talks about the conflict without harassing Hamas for their actions and counter revolutionary activity, who is silent about Puerto Rico, who is silent about catalonia, South Sudan, Rojava, who is willing to sacrifice LGBTQ for a 'revolutionary struggle', who is idealistic on the analysis of the history and the material conditions in the places is not actual consistent revolutionary, but a particularist.