Egon to the_dunk_tank • edit-22 months ago*Permanently Deleted*trashmessage-squaremessage-square137 fedilinkarrow-up1204file-text
arrow-up1204message-square*Permanently Deleted*trashEgon to the_dunk_tank • edit-22 months agomessage-square137 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]hexbear12·1 year agooh dang the enemy used mines! my one weakness! link
minus-squarecaptcha [any]hexbear6·1 year agoYou seem to be under the delusion thats there's well known solution to mine fields. Russia did a good strategy. link
minus-squareProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]hexbear12·1 year agoI'm merely stating that Ukraine shouldn't be doing an offensive against mined areas without air superiority. "NATO tactics" apparently seems to be code for "having more jets and drones and fighting poor unarmed militias" link
minus-squareusernamesaredifficul [he/him]hexbear4·1 year agoalso just ignoring the fact there are mines in training and planning is not a good counter link
minus-squarecaptcha [any]hexbear1·1 year ago "NATO tactics" apparently seems to be code for "having more jets and drones and fighting poor unarmed militias" Absolutely correct and basically my point. The dunk is on NATO. The lemmy is correct. link
oh dang the enemy used mines! my one weakness!
You seem to be under the delusion thats there's well known solution to mine fields. Russia did a good strategy.
I'm merely stating that Ukraine shouldn't be doing an offensive against mined areas without air superiority. "NATO tactics" apparently seems to be code for "having more jets and drones and fighting poor unarmed militias"
also just ignoring the fact there are mines in training and planning is not a good counter
Absolutely correct and basically my point. The dunk is on NATO. The lemmy is correct.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator