This following on reflections today I've been thinking/posting about all day. With the in-progress major realignment of the Democrats and Republicans the conditions for the emergence of a genuine American fascism are now possible save for the existence of an organized left. Arguably, this can be taken up by the existence of a "phantom" organized left in the form of AntiFa and Soros type conspiracy theorizing and scaremongering.

Essentially, the Republicans, as representing the factional interest of the provincial "national bourgeoisie" are, by some nightmarish convergence of factors, becoming the primary voice for genuine working-class interests. They are achieving this through appeals to several sentiments:

  • Anti-Intellectualism
  • Performative Anti-Elitism
  • Anti-Cosmopolitanism
  • Anti-Free Trade Protectionism and Autarky
  • Single-Issue Cultural Grievances
  • Ultra-nationalistic patriotism
  • Appeal to "traditional values"
  • The accelerating spread of conspiratorial thinking

Trump overperformed in non-white demographics. Arguably the single most important takeaway from this election is that identity is no longer a highly deterministic factor in partisan affiliation and voting behavior. Already-incoherent political beliefs of the average American is making individual non-white voters fixate on single issues and emotional impulses, and in the absence of a heavily class-based economic appeal to the working class (which the Democrats have now definitively and explicitly rejected to exploit), this is causing the non-college-educated to respond favorably to the sentimental appeals of the Republicans. Trump overperformed with African-Americans and Latinos by between 3-5 points. His share of the LGBT vote doubled from 2016. Clearly, these people care about something more than him being an obvious and overt racist and bigot. Clearly, they are gravitating to him because he is voicing their legitimate grievances that no other politician has been.

Trump's proto-fascism actually holds back the emergence of a genuine American fascism in two key aspects. Firstly, despite being a demagogue Trump is personally ideologically incoherent. He most just says what immediately comes to his mind or thinks will play well to the crowd. You can't imagine Trump writing a manifesto like Gentile or Hitler. Secondly, Trump's nativist populism is overly inward-looking. It is about closing off the frontier from invaders, not expanding them indefinitely. It lacks the inherent fascist drive toward self-annihilation.

But what does embody the fascist drive toward self-annihilation within the Republican Party? Bush-era neoconservatism, and the ideological paradigm that led us to invade Iraq. Trump's administration in practice degenerated into a bog-standard neoconservative administration, but without the overt drive to outright invade other countries and "spread democracy". He has largely continued to rely on Obama-style tactics centering air power, covert operations, and backing color revolutionaries. Again, this is in large part due to the personality of Trump himself. He is averse to actually starting wars he could possibly lose. He is anti-imperialist, at least purely at the rhetorical level. He is ideologically incoherent. His foreign policy has actually weakened empire abroad, despite laying the foundations for a new cold war with China, and the Democrats have laid the foundations to include Russia in that cold war.

The stage is now set for some post-Trump figure to emerge. Someone who synthesizes the populist appeals outlined above that derive from Trump, with Bush-era neoconservative ideology and foreign policy. Because the Republicans, in this realignment, are becoming an otherwise incoherent coalition of big business interests (chiefly in the fossil fuel and defense manufacturing sectors), petty bourgeoisie, rural reactionaries, and genuine working-class people who have had their lives destroyed by neoliberal free trade and are now turning to Trump and what he represents if they are not retreating from politics altogether. They are becoming a party of the class-collaborationism that is inherent to fascisms.

  • qublics [they/them,she/her]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Having struggle sessions and accepting people are not mutually exclusive.
    The goal of struggle sessions is to get people thinking in a more sensible and ideologically coherent direction.
    Edit: what you are saying essentially is that we should embrace anti-intellectualism.

    • Papanurgel [none/use name]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      You may see struggle sessions that way. But I just see a bunch of people raging the fuck out.

      And yes. Accept in the uninformed that agree with some of our big ideas and than mold them.

      Other wise lose

      • qublics [they/them,she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Guess I'm just too used to seeing "heated online debate"
        If nobody is getting doxxed then it is all rather cordial really.

        • Papanurgel [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Lol really?

          They aren't heated, it's people raging the fuck out.

          The reason the right grows is becuase they accept people that hold a smidge of their beliefs than push them further right.

      • qublics [they/them,she/her]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Wait that was too friendly, here let me try again...
        If people cannot handle an effectively anonymous completely voluntary online struggle sesh, then they're almost useless as leftist comrades anyway :elmofire::elmofire::elmofire: they should go out and vote instead.
        What is leftism without confrontation? Might as well send thoughts and prayers.
        dOn'T BriNg PoLiTiCS tO My mEmE PaGe!

          • qublics [they/them,she/her]
            ·
            4 years ago

            That is exactly the point. You act like people that argue about things are "dividing the left" but all it takes is a joke for you to be the one that is overtly exclusionary.
            You don't have the guts to say which struggle sessions you have a problem with.
            Should we just stop educating people about China? Is that the one you were thinking about?

            • Papanurgel [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              I have a problem with the way people conduct them selves with in struggle sessions. It's mostly a rage fest. As I have now said for the 3rd time

              • qublics [they/them,she/her]
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 years ago

                See "left needs to stop having struggle sessions" is very different from "a problem with the way people conduct themselves within struggle sessions"
                In that case a better approach would be something like guidelines, encouraging people to walk away, or just more practice honestly.

                I noticed @Civility replying to comments that are too much with just emojis sometimes, that might be a good thing to normalize.

                • Papanurgel [none/use name]
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Struggle sessions are a legit joke at this point. They are joke becuase most people know that it's just a bunch of leftist going after each other.

                  • qublics [they/them,she/her]
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    OH NO INTERNET LEFTISTS CARE ABOUT DIALECTIC SO CRINGE!!!!!

                    Struggle sessions on ChapoChat are fun and interesting and if dislike those so much then do not participate.