wrong, it is possible to hold a moral position which condemns bestiality whilst also being ok with some if not all forms of using rabbits for dietary consumption. no, i will not explain. the vegan struggle session is tiresome af and i need at least another hour of drinking before work tomorrow.
that is correct, there are no circumstances where murder is okay. there are various reasons you might need to kill, but I wouldn't describe any of them as murder.
The words we use for non-consensual killing are entirely context based. there is no meaningful difference between any of them except whether the person choosing what word to use thinks it was justified. Also, killing an innocent person in cold blood is murder period. there are still circumstances where this ok because it causes more good\prevents more harm than not doing so.
killing an innocent person in cold blood is murder period. there are still circumstances where this ok
I do not agree. You will never in your life be faced with a circumstance where you need to murder someone to save 2 other people unless you actually live in a trolley problem comic strip. It's fun to think about, but it has nothing to do with the real world.
This is true, but only because she's a cop and not because she's a bunny
to be faiiiiiiirrrrrrr, fucking an actual rabbit is bad and you should feel bad if you do.
this view is only consistent if you also condemn eating rabbits
wrong, it is possible to hold a moral position which condemns bestiality whilst also being ok with some if not all forms of using rabbits for dietary consumption. no, i will not explain. the vegan struggle session is tiresome af and i need at least another hour of drinking before work tomorrow.
that would be like holding the moral position that its wrong to rape people but not to murder them
its just poorly thought out.
Implying there are not circumstances where murder is ok.
I think it's okay to murder as long as you intend to eat the victim.
that is correct, there are no circumstances where murder is okay. there are various reasons you might need to kill, but I wouldn't describe any of them as murder.
The words we use for non-consensual killing are entirely context based. there is no meaningful difference between any of them except whether the person choosing what word to use thinks it was justified. Also, killing an innocent person in cold blood is murder period. there are still circumstances where this ok because it causes more good\prevents more harm than not doing so.
I do not agree. You will never in your life be faced with a circumstance where you need to murder someone to save 2 other people unless you actually live in a trolley problem comic strip. It's fun to think about, but it has nothing to do with the real world.