They don't know about TC69 thought clueless

badeline-jokerfied WE LITERALLY HAD A THREAD CLINGING ONTO brigading YESTERDAY WHERE WE (HEXBEAR AND LEMMYGRAD USERS MAINLY) HAD TO BEAT BACK VISITING LIBERALS EN MASSE FOR THEIR CONDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR TRANS PEOPLE, YOU SMUG FUCK lenin-rage

I'm so fucking tired of these egocentric smarmy pricks lea-tired

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Another lib who acts hostile towards the act of reading. Many such cases!

      • HornyOnMain
        ·
        1 year ago

        Libs coming in acting like they're i-think-that and entirely ready to get banned for speaking truth to power and then just don't makes me feel a kinda second hand embarrassment for them.
        If they say a slur and get banned they can at least make a "tankies are suppressing my free speech (to call for the killing of homeless people)" post and get some sympathy responses but just getting dunked on and remaining unbanned after trying to act like we disallow any dissent is just embarrassing.

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          insert ten year old screenshot of some redditor posting "i'm going to get banned for this but fuck the see see pee" with ten thousand upvotes and a stack of awards from years after the original comment

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      And you can't really make any actual points from all that reading in a couple paragraphs.

      so-true If it can't be described in a quick listicle it must not be true

      • Magician [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, the State Department works really hard to distill disinformation into snappy talking points.

        Remember when libs laughed at trump needing bullet points when staffers tried to give him documents and paperwork to read?

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        19 days ago

        deleted by creator

    • HornyOnMain
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want a ban my advice is just to say a slur or something bigotted and you'll get banned in like 5 to 10 minutes, weakly prodding that people haven't read enough won't get you banned, we already do that to each other all the time

    • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]M
      ·
      1 year ago

      I'm ready for the ban, because I don't think the people running this want actual discussion.

      I'll let you cook. Let's see where this goes. Got my eye out though.

    • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]
      ·
      1 year ago

      You've been arguing the same point here for weeks and you still think you'll be silenced just because everyone here is afraid of what you have to say? Are you going to keep repeating this every few weeks?

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      19 days ago

      deleted by creator

    • Magician [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess that's on us to assume you're willing to read more than a pamphlet of text before forming an opinion. shrug-outta-hecks

    • Catradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's weird how you guys throw "reading" in there, but you always cite hours of reading you know people aren't going to do. And you can't really make any actual points from all that reading in a couple paragraphs.

      MAYBE FUCKING READ A GODDAMN BOOK FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE, YOU AREN'T ILLITERATE, FUCKING READ SOMETHING YOU SHITHEAD

      Im beginning to wonder if you're just genuinely incapable of being smart