The mods have shown how they do not care about the posters opinions they just ban people whenever they fgeel like it. Take a look at the mod logs if you care youll see these weird ban reasons like "wrecking" and "sectarianism". The reason why these terms exist is to attack the people with different opinions and the way they get silenced is by the power the mods and admins use. Ive asked so many times for democratic moderation why is it that we cant have it? If the mods gave a shit about their "socialism" as much as their "democratic control over the means of production" wouldnt they give the posters even have the power to influence bans?

  • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
    1·
    4 years ago

    I mean if you won't even acknowledge objective historical fact, there is no reason to really bother arguing with you. Go outside.

    • socialist [she/her]
      7·
      4 years ago

      ASSAD WAS A DICTATOR PEOPLE WANTED TO CHOOSE THE GHOUL IN CHARGE AND ASSAD STARTED BOMBING THEM HOW IMPERIALIST IS IT

        • socialist [she/her]
          8·
          4 years ago

          How does supporting a gonocidal non us aligned dictator go along with your "anti-imperialism"

              • socialist [she/her]
                7·
                4 years ago

                I guess syrians should have just all proclaimed assad as their divine ruler

                  • socialist [she/her]
                    6·
                    4 years ago

                    What do you think socialism is? is it reading some 150 year old books and proclaiming that this is how we should do everything or actually trying to fight for everyones rights

            • socialist [she/her]
              7·
              4 years ago

              it never came up that there was no need to be for either one

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        1·
        4 years ago

        Imagine thinking you're a "leftist" and believing this ridiculous interpretation of events. Go outside