He said "If you see our company policy we treat it like a cold now"

No paid time off of course, so I'm currently eating through my own cash so that I don't get my coworkers sick

covid-cool

  • CarbonScored [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This remains a policy that hurts both employers AND employees, studies show actual sick leave actually improves performance and work attendance. It's another example of why the system isn't even engineered for profit, it's engineered for shitting on the poor.

    Go in and cough violently on everything in your boss' vicinity.

    • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is obvious to anyone with half a fucking brain. Sick people don’t do good work, and make other people sick. Duh.

      Why are capitalists so shitty at capitalism, their cruelty hurts their ability to benefit themselves!

    • HamManBad [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same thing with universal healthcare. It's way cheaper for businesses, but the current US system gives them tons of leverage. Power at all costs

      • CarbonScored [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, I guess that's it, having leverage. Guarantee the workers too much and they might feel able to demand a fair society.

      • ReadFanon [any, any]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There's another aspect to universal healthcare which gets overlooked in mainstream discourse and that is the fact that when the government is ultimately responsible for paying for the health and wellbeing of its citizens, regardless of the flaws in real-world implementation, then the government has a financial commitment to the overall wellbeing of society.

        Y'know how the US has lead in the water in thousands of areas?

        That impacts on health outcomes. And that costs the government money in the long run under a universal healthcare system.

        So there's a major incentive for the government to get its shit together and act to protect citizens in order to save on the long-term costs by engaging in primary and preventative healthcare under a universal healthcare model.

        There's a reason why countries like New Zealand are taking a hard stance against tobacco - it's because that's a public health disaster and it costs the government a small fortune in healthcare when people are sick and dying because of smoking.

        Do I hate the market rationalism? Of course.

        But do I prefer the fact that under a universal healthcare model that the government has a direct financial interest in the health and wellbeing of each citizen? Of course.